sparrows and sandcastles

free thinking about life, current affairs, literature, theology and the english language

Tag: religious fundamentalism

primitive pentecostals

 

A wiry forty-something, duracell-charged indian mickey mouse bounces onto the stage. It is ten minutes past twelve. The homily is over and the tubby guest preacher from a fundamentalist-run halfway house for convicted drug addicts has shuffled himself off the glass pulpit.

 

The mickey mouse becomes mighty mouse. His diminutive frame rattles like a child toy as he starts to “share” his hindu-to-charismaniac conversion story with a screech that is too stentorian for his seemingly rodentish pair of lungs. It is the only consolation for my very english ears.

 

The Hi-5 sing-song cabaret has begun. He is the sincere kitchen sink choked with rat-brained fervour. Although he appears to have hypnotised ninety per cent of his fellow rat brains in the congregation with tear jerkers about human rights violations against the “christians” by the Indian authorities and Hindu extremists in his country, I am unpersuaded.

 

It seems unlikely that a country which boasts of a polytheistic majority would dislike the “christian” minority so much as to want to attempt to exterminate them like vermin. Many hindus view Jesus as among their hindu divine pantheon and have great respect for the christian ethos.

 

Unless…the christians themselves behave like vermin.

 

In the case of this bouncing mighty mouse, this is the likely scenario. He admittedly desires for the whole of India to hear the Christian gospel message and be “saved”, eventually. It is no wonder. No one likes fundamentalists who behave as though they are the only ones with the truth. No one likes mentally deluded crackpots who expect the entire world to follow their religion. And since India is so unlike civilised Europe, the only plausible “solution” to the fundamentalist menace would be physical violence and judicial discrimination.

 

The physical violence against the christians are appalling and should be protested against, but the primate in me, no matter how evolved, cannot resist the urge to finger-point the christians as the cause of their own plight. They seem to deserve it.

 

The mighty mouse in question is a Mr Jacob Marineni, an Indian Hindu who allegedly experienced some mystical delusions of Jesus when he was a cancer-riddled seven-year-old. He claims that the doctors at that time, from 1978 India at that, could not do anything to cure his luekemia and left him to die. But it was Jesus who miraculously healed him.

 

Since the diagnosis and the account cannot be verified by expert witnesses, I will doubt his fairy tale. Even if he really had some serious ailment of sorts and is now apparently so unsick, such “miraculous” recuperations can be explained naturalistically, without any claim to supernatural intervention. Experience informs me that such stories are usually exaggerated and embellished over time, especially religiously-inspired stories. And there is no logical link between the sincerity of the storyteller and the veracity of his claims.

 

He is also the pastor of his own tribal church, and the founder of a fundamentalist organisation which, among many other initiatives, seek to shelter (and “save”) as many street-housed orphans as possible. While I applaud his efforts in making this fucked up world a better place to live in, his crackpot ideology ruins it all for me. It is IMMORAL to sell humanitarian help to helpless people with the price of proselytisation.

 

We help because we want to. We love because we want to love. Period. We do not help someone so that we can blackmail them into accepting our ideology or religion.

 

That is disgusting.

 

*******

bible study? come on…

 

Last afternoon’s ninety-odd minutes of amateurish opining on a haphazardly collected thousand-plus pages of a premodern near-eastern text, did not went well. While studying the classical literary texts require participants to involve their cerebral cortexes to think critically about issues like interpretation and exegesis, as well as redaction or form criticisms, yesterday’s attempt seemed to assume a Mother Goose’s Nursery Rhymes for the text in question.

 

It is tedious work to interpret a text which is, among other things, a few thousand years old, anonymously authored and in a language other than the current lingua franca, English. Serious students of say, The Analects of Confucius, know that it is a waste of time to dabble in an English translation of the work without engaging the original Chinese text. There are many issues which will get muddled, let alone lost, in translation.

 

Besides, what’s the use of talking cock to one another about “how one feels” about a text when we should be talking sense about “what the text actually says”. Worst of all, despite what the facilitator may claim to the rest of us, he is already a dogmatist on what he thinks the text should mean. Not unlike modern totalitarian states like North Korea and Iran, participants are apparently butchered, via herd instinct, to bleat out only nice things about our Kim Il Sung in the sky – as well as ask only The Idiot’s Guide to-type of questions.

 

It seems to me that penetrating questions are not allowed – questions that should, by all counts of intellectual honesty, be asked.

 

All right, perhaps I should get to the point. We were “studying” a piece of ancient scribble called The Epistle (or letter) to the Ephesians. It is part of the twenty-seven-book koine greek corpus called the Christian New Testament. It is bound alongside the usually thirty-nine-book ancient hebrew cum aramaic corpus called the Hebrew Scriptures, which are often christened, albeit dishonestly, as the Christian Old Testament. It takes only an ignoramus to assume a “christian” provenance for the ancient near-eastern work.

 

While no serious New Testament scholar in modern times will thumb print certify that Paul of Tarsus wrote the letter, evangelical christians often prefer to ignore this difficulty and just assume pauline authorship. Many choose to do so to protect their cherished but very mistaken view that the bible was fingered by the cananite-hebrew deity – Yahweh – himself. Common sense suggests that just by the very haphazard way in which the bible was compiled through history erases the silly notion of a perfect deity writing or dictating a perfect and inerrant work.

 

Many evangelical christians choose to believe in this premodern idea because they have invested too much, their entire lives, in this god racket. They will not and cannot endure the existential pain if their cherished book turns out to be only a fairy tale, an Arthurian myth of the ancient Jewish people and the early christian community which has no historical validity and thus no eternal truth.

 

Poor me. I do not care about subscribing to a falsehood because it makes me feel good or happy. I only care about knowing the truth, even if that means a purpose-less and meaning-less universe that is impartial to biological life, let alone human life. An atheistic humanism is thus about living courageously, meaningfully and with dignity in the face of a possible annihilation of all that we know to be dear to us.

 

*******

crackpot comments in a crackpot world

 

Marion Gordon Robertson is one of the most housewife-watched raisined faces in evangelical charismatic crackpotdom. He is vulgarly known as Pat Robertson, and is the founder of many poisonous organisations like the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), the Christian Coalition and Regent University.

 

He is also notorious for making so many reptilian-brained comments on his surprisingly influential telly tubby programme, The 700 Club, that his very countenance becomes the epitome of evangelical mental retardation.

 

This is the rambling snake himself:

 

 

 

Here is a delicious sample of some of his most retarded remarks:

 

“Just like what Nazi Germany did to the Jews, so liberal America is now doing to the evangelical Christians. It is the Democratic Congress, the liberal-based media and the homosexuals who want to destroy the Christians. More terrible than anything suffered by any minority in history.”

 

“The feminist agenda…is about a socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practise witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.”

 

“I would warn Orlando that you’re right in the way of some serious hurricanes…this is not a message of hate – this is a message of redemption. But a condition like this will bring about the destruction of your nation. It’ll bring about terrorist bombs; it’ll bring earthquakes, tornadoes, and possibly a meteor.”

(on “gay days” at Disney World)

 

“God considers this land to be his…for any prime minister of Israel who decides he is going to carve it up and give it away, God says, ‘No, this is mine’…he was dividing God’s land…Woe unto any prime minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the EU, the UN, or the USA…”

(on why Israeli PM Ariel Sharon suffered a massive stroke)

 

“It may be a blessing in disguise…haitians were originally under the heel of the French…and they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said we will serve you if you will get us free from the French. True story. And so, the devil said, okay, it is a deal. Ever since they have been cursed by one thing after another.”

(on the earthquake in Haiti)

 

“And you don’t want to deal with horoscopes…it has a satanic pull to it.”

(on horoscopes)

 

“You don’t want to fool with that stuff. It is at best demonic, at worst it’s just superstition.”

(on feng shui)

 

“If enough people were praying, God would’ve intervened. You could pray, Jesus stilled the storm, you can still storms.”

(on tornadoes ripping through the Midwest)

 

“There is no such thing as separation of church and state in the Constitution. It is a lie of the Left and we are not going to take it anymore.”

(in a speech in 1993)

 

“Psychics get their power from demons.”

(on psychics on The 700 Club, 2006)

 

“It is happening because God Almighty is lifting his protection from us.”

(on the terrorists attacks, Sept 14, 2001)

 

“Planned Parenthood is teaching kids to fornicate, teaching people to have adultery, every kind of bestiality, homosexuality, lesbianism – everything that the bible condemns.”

(on The 700 Club, 1991)

 

“Many of those people who worked with Adolf Hitler were Satanists, many of them were homosexuals – the two things seem to go together.”

(on The 700 Club, 1993)

 

This senile toad also labels any film with ghouls, vampires and witches “demonic”, such as the teenage cheapo Twilight series and Harry Potter.

 

Before anyone claims Robertson as part of the lunatic minority, be enlightened to the fact that the largest and fastest growing segment within contemporary christianity are the pentecostals and charismatics, of which Robertson’s demon-hunting paranoia is a very common theological motif. Educated and hence liberal christians make up a dwindling teeny weeny minority.

 

Charismatic christians in Singapore litter the largest congregations in the country, namely City Harvest Church, New Creation Church, Faith Community Baptist Church, Lighthouse Evangelism, Trinity Christian Centre, Victory Family Centre, Bathesda Cathedral, etc.

 

And despite the deliberate lies in front of a mediacorp camera, many of these third-world, premodern wannabes subscribe to the delusion of an immaterial world cupped to the brim with angels and demons who control world events, natural disasters and human behaviour.

 

It is also fucking difficult to get these people, many of them decent and educated human beings, from being willing specimens of religious brainwashing and deception.

 

Sad.

 

*******

 

escape chapel party

 

Singapore continues to anally rape its nonreligious citizens with its syphillic brand of multireligious “tolerance”, one that strangles our civil freedom to opinion and expression. Singaporeans are brain freezed into glazing only at the Disney channel when it comes to religion (and politics) while nonreligion is open market and can be AXNed by anyone at any time.

 

Many of us are now frostbited to be self-censoring and hypocritically respectful, tickling the scrotums of religious “sensibilities” even if some of us would rather be fingering the heathen. It is just not right. It is immoral.

 

Advertiser Creative Insurgence has for more than a week red-carpeted its campaign for the coming Escape Chapel Party to be held at the Chijmes Chapel this Saturday at 9pm onwards. The party is a spur to promote UK-based “Escape” nightclub brand to the region.

 

(source)

 

 

Even this one is as benign as my cheeky daughter playing peekaboo under the bed covers. It is as holy as stupid sheep. But many Singaporeans seem to disagree, most of them, I reckon, bleeting among the local roman catholic community. They claim these visuals of beautiful nuns are “offensive” and “in bad taste”. Many even filed reports to the police (!!??) and the various local ministries.

 

Creative Insurgence is perhaps trying to give a tongue-in-cheeky humour to the party, since it is held in a former religious convent and that coincidentally, this week is the fucking holy week. The organisers originally wanted the party to be held over the Spring Festival weekend in January but due to circumstances postponed to the next public holiday, namely the coming Bloody Friday cum Walking Dead weekend.

 

As expected, the organisers promptly apologised to the phallus-crowned supremo of the catholic diocese in Singapore, a Mr Nicholas Chia, whose office is devilishly located a few nun-jiggle steps away at the Cathedral of the Good Shepherd. They also recycle-binned the nuns from their main website.

 

This is Singapore, and this is how the pasteurised version of the blasphemy law is enforced in this peaceful and loving multireligious country. The absence of criminalisation does not make it any less vile. What if vice versa? Can freethinkers and atheists file reports to the police if we find posters about evangelistic meetings and christian outreach programme to the non-christians offensive? We have a right to be offended, don’t we? Can the LGBTQ community squeal their offence over schools that promote anti-gay agendas in their sex education programmes?

 

The above pictures are already so mild. I think I shall leave you with these:

 

(source)

 

(source)

 

There are more fucking nuns, literally, out there, but I shall have the christian virtue of self-control and just stop here.

 

*******

did god shrivel the tumour?

 

In mid-December 2010, after a series of tests, I received a diagnosis of lung cancer, stage 4. There were lesions in my brain, nodules on my adrenal glands and my lymph nodes were also swollen. The bones of my right shoulder and arm were also infected. The cancer-marker reading was 422 (normal = 0-5). The prognosis was that I had a few months left, without medical intervention or if I did not respond well to it.

In desperation I cried out to the Lord, declaring “Lord, I have faith that You will heal me; honour my faith. But first, increase my measure of faith!!!”….

…During the January Touch Jesus, He Heals! service, Rev Francis commanded the tumour to melt and leave and I rested in the presence of the Holy Spirit. Others also witnessed to me (later) that he had pronounced “I see cancer no more!!”

Hallelujah! After about 7 weeks of oral chemo, my CT scan on 17 February 2011 showed that the tumour in my lung had shrunk from a formidable 4.6 x 4.1 cm to 2.1 x 1.6 cm.

- source

 

The last statement says it all. Thank Jupiter, Zeus and Santa Claus for modern science! God did not do anything to this woman – it was the seven weeks of chemotherapy that shrinks the tumour!

 

Why are the religious so blind??

 

*******

 

types of extremists

 

 

 

(source)

 

:) :) :)

 

 

 

despots and cheerleaders

 

Christians sometimes betray their cheer-leadered beliefs in a prayer-answering, illness-healing and New York Knicks-supporting grandfather in the sky when they offer revival meetings and church camps as solutions to the shriveling faith of a thomasian believer.

 

This all-powerful monarch who supposedly created the singularity that exploded into the universe about 14 billion years ago, although current cosmology suggests the possibility of either an infinite or multiple universe; and who sends tsunamis to muslims and earthquakes to homosexuals and pagans; appears impotent to revitalise a sceptical and doubting believer without resorting to the hysterical antics of crackpot “revivalists” and televangelists.

 

Yahweh, as this capricious sugar daddy is called, does not, or maybe cannot, do home visits. He appears to “heal” people of colds, backaches and sometimes even cancer and AIDS (often without official documentation) only at special events like miracle services, revival meetings and healing rallies. He rarely plies his trade in private.

 

Even if he does, he tortures the believer by dishing his power ever so incrementally that by the time the naif manages to praise his or her maker for his “healing”, one is surprised that the medical treatments and bodily rest do not work. 

 

One does well by watching british mentalist Derren Brown as he uses psychological tricks to deceive unsuspecting audiences into believing he is a real psychic, christian faith healer, and what-have-you. In one particular programme, he even recruits a stranger from the London streets and trains him to pretend to be an itinerant preacher and faith healer. The team then travels to the US and that was where the fun starts.

 

There is a lot of crowd psychology at work and what the professionals call mass hypnosis in mass gatherings of like-minded people like revival meetings, miracle services and church camps. It also helps that there is lots of congregational singing and repetitive choruses, spurred by the preacher’s cheerleading rants and slogans. All of that helps to psyche the followers and creates an atmosphere suitable for influencing the subconscious mind through group and auto-suggestion.

 

Church camps are the same. Like the mate who complains recently of fellow parishioners trying to hard-sell a forthcoming church camp to him, it takes only a God to fan the charcoaled flames of faith without human interference.

 

*******

 

brain dead

 

(source)

 

;) :) ;)

 

 

horror show

 

She is light chocolate-tanned, has a raisin complexion, and demonstrates the demeanor of a fiftyish tai tai. She is Lela*, a church acquaintance and new friend in our cosy Sunday small group gatherings contemplating our christian Illiad, the bible.

 

Her rainbowed shadow grows large during the proceedings, as she “shares” about how much she fears God now, after more than two decades of, in her own words, “leading a colourful life”. Isn’t it fun to have a flavoured existence? It seems she believes now that a christian life should be one binary black-and-white affair. Technicolour, plasmic and HD visuals are not the pious christian thing.

 

This mildly megalomaniac loves a confession, and does so augustinianly. She is into real estate, and is working hard to make money for her twenty-somethinger who is heading to university after his mandatory military stint. She had him at twenty two, which means she is fortyish. She blooms into this fiftyish amorphophallus titanium through chain-smoking, binge-drinking and maybe a one-night-stand or two although she makes no admission of any such fleshly pleasure.

 

But – yes, one always expect a conditional conjunction from a pious christian who starts ranting about worldly pleasures –  she no longer smokes, at all. She no longer drinks, not a teardrop.

 

She cannot stomach primetime telly, except the news, and like a hormonal pregnant lass who pisses at certain smells and scents, forbids her son from enjoying his latest fix of contemporary pop noise.

 

She empathises with her son, she says, but she fears God now. I didn’t know this god of hers is petty about people’s tastes in addictions, film and music. She even experiences devilish epiphanies of sweet tobacco at bus stops even though she claims there is no cigarette butt in sight. A “work of the devil”, definitely. One should actually suggest to her that vestigial tobacco scents do linger in the air for a significant amount of time, especially in places like bus stops where smokers enjoy the quickie before their next bus. There appears to be no fag in the proximity because cleaners have done a wonderful job! Unfortunately for them, there will come a time when smokers will be discriminated against, in totalitarian Singapore. Or at least that’s the wish of some ministers in the regime. One can also explain to her that for someone who was a tobacco-addict, there is nothing supernatural about the human brain feeding hallucinations and delusions into the self-conscious mind about past sensory addictions.

 

She fears God now. He gets cross and will bitch if she sits passively by while her colleagues offer joss sticks and suckling pig to some taoist pantheon after a successful transaction. Oh dear, she has become a bigot. A fundamentalist christian bigot who is hormonal against other religions. Oh my fucking Zeus.

 

Several nods of approval from my fellow christian automatons later, it starts to feel creepy. At least for me, the lone sceptic. I don’t wish to be her friend, not now, not later. Never. But she is more than welcomed to divulge her exciting explorations into carnal decadence. I fantasize sometimes, about my embracing the writer’s wretched life with urns of tobacco and caffeine, and waterboarded sips of alcohol. Think of the late Christopher Hitchens. And his oxford mate, Martin Amis. Or Albert Camus, Frank o’Hara, Jack Spicer, Michel Foucault. Damn it, or any human being for chrissake.

 

Anyhow, people like me are just hell money for the bonfire, in her eyes.

 

(*not her real name)

 

*******

 

 

christian sexism

 

“Woman is more guilty than man, because she was seduced by Satan, and so diverted her husband from obedience to God that she was an instrument of death leading to all perdition. It is necessary that woman recognise this, and that she learn to what she is subjected; and not only against her husband. This is reason enough why today she is placed below and that she bears within her ignominy and shame.”

- John Calvin, protestant theologian, author of The Institutes of the Christian Religion

 

 

 

orwellian evil

 

Lad magazines are rare, if not extinct, in Singapore’s officially prudish and ruling party-controlled newstands. Even the lustier ones like For Him Magazine (FHM) and Maxim are controlled by Big Brother – anything resembling the genitalia or the tits are opined as pornographic – which more than anything reveals the clerical immaturity of the authorities.

 

And the citizens. Remember the commercial walls of Orchard Road and their beautifully depicted male modeled muscled abbominals? Many among the public were pontificating about its abdominal obscenity, oblivious to the enlightened snickers of the discerningly educated few who are scratching our heads, wondering what the fucking fuss it was all about.

 

The perpretators of such ignorance are often the religiously motivated, drugged by a peculiar moral logic which rests on ancient texts instead of science and reason. Yes, primarily the ancient and thus very ignorant books of the monotheistic trinity of religions.

 

It baffles the common sense when any subject from politics (anywhere in the world except Singapore and the idiotic Asian lands) to football to Greek mythology can be slaughtered in the abbatoir of public discourse but NOT religion. The people “of the book” seem to be one very schizophrenic mob who would wince and weep at any jibe, profane or not, at their icons.

 

It is totalitarian, to say the least. It is the epitome of the orwellian vision of dystopia. It is evil.

 

Three days ago, the National Council of Churches of Singapore (NCCS) squealed like a hurt flesh of infant swine against two articles published in the latest edition of FHM. I didn’t know the council reads FHM. Godless and evil men like me do not even read FHM. I read the King James Bible. Really.

 

FHM pulled off shelves, editor apologises

 

The NCCS statement claimed that the articles “make fun of the Lord Jesus Christ” and “…hurt the sensitivities of the Christian community.”

 

Hmm. Does Bishop Dr Robert Solomon, president of the NCCS, who with three other leading clerics signed the statement, really know what he is talking about? HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR ARTICLES IN FHM TO HURT THE FEELINGS OF CHRISTIANS? UNLESS CHRISTIANS READ FHM.

 

Oh, I must be very ignorant then. I didn’t realise the godly christians in Singapore read FHM. There must be some good holy stuff there which I am not aware of which edifies my christian brethren. Must be the beauties of God’s creation.

 

Ungodly men like me only read the theology journals and Rowan Williams. And Marcus Borg. And John Spong. And George Orwell. And Evelyn Waugh. And Charles Dickens. And Ian Mcewan. Sigh.

 

Apart from the two blasphemous articles, perhaps I should start reading FHM. NCCS thinks it influences the christian community.

 

*******

 

christian bigotry in the US

 

It seems that there are christians, especially those in the intellectually-challenged US south, who use LGBT people for target practice. And they are not pig or crocodile farmers, mind you.

 

Senior Pastor Steve Riggle of a 15,000-member Grace Community Church in Houston, Texas recently played prophet by asking for the head of the city’s mayor. He accused the lesbian leader for not upholding the city’s constitution in regards to marriage.

 

Megachurch Pastor asks Texas Mayor to quit over Gay Activism

 

Yet this prick-poking preacher does not realise he is also bashing his bible on a lectern he does not own. Politics.

 

It is not surprising that the director of the Houston Area Pastor Council supports the fool. Thank Zeus I am not Texan.

 

Another christian, this time a school principal – WHAT IN THE NAME OF ZEUS AND HERCULES – yes, a school principal (how did she become principal, one wonder), of a high school in Tennesse, commented in a public assembly that gay students are “not on god’s path” and will be going to hell anyway. This woman wanker also threaten expulsion for these students.

 

Haywood Principal quits over anti-gay remarks

 

All praise to Zeus and Oscar Wilde, once again, for guiding the hands of the poor students in complaining their plight to the authorities. The fool resigned from her post as a result.

 

Good riddance.

 

And these loonies still want to claim that their religion is a force for good in the world?

 

Bizarre. Really.

 

*******

 

god hates westboro baptist church

 

(source)

 

:) :) :)

 

this IS christianity in singapore…

 

(source)

Thailand. The land of the free. The constitutional monarchy with a very well-loved and respected King. The country of smiles.

But did you know? Thailand is a place of little true joy. Buddhism is so much a part of the Thai national identity and permeates into every level of society and culture that only about one hundred Thais accept Christ each year in the country of over 68 million people.

Do you share the burden of being that one small change agent, bringing the gospel to the Thais, one at a time?

With its many temples and monks, it is hard to ignore the fact that Buddhism is Thailand’s national religion. With only 16% christians, most Thai students see christianity only as a foreign religion. The land of smiles needs to hear the gospel message. Come and share with Khonkaen University students that Jesus is the way, the true and the life!

Go Change. World.  

 

For someone who lives under the christian subculture in Singapore, it is easy for me to mock the online cacophony over the poster above as white noise. In fact, I invite any practising christian in Singapore, to challenge me on this – that the above IS REPRESENTATIVE, very accurately indeed, of grassroots christianity as subscribed (orthodoxy) and practised (orthopraxy) in this country.

 

NUS student group says sorry for insensitive remarks

 

For anyone blissfully ignorant of Campus Crusade for Christ (CCC), of which the NUS (National University of Singapore) campus branch is responsible for the above advertisement (which caused much noise in the online community), it is an evangelical parachurch organisation founded by an already deceased William (Bill) Bright. Its main purpose is to spread (really, to proselytise) the christian religion all over the world. It has many branches, with sub “ministries” in tertiary campuses, all over the world. The main polytechnics in Singapore, namely Singapore, Ngee Ann, Temasek and Nanyang, have CCC ministries (I am not sure about the newest polytechnic, Republic) along with the two main universities, NUS and NTU (Nanyang Technological University).

 

I was a member in one of those branches during my school days.

 

And so let anyone accuse, dishonestly and deceptively, that I have no credibility to assert what I am asserting now. In fact, in the deluded madness of my youth, I wanted to enter the seminary to become a pastor. This led me to years of personal study and research (and anguish) into christian theology, biblical studies and historical criticism (which eventually led me to my free-thinking secular humanism). I suppose that is one of the reasons why I am still earnestly interested in the academic study of the bible.

 

Now, contrary to what CCC Singapore as well as the rest of the christian community who want to distance themselves from CCC claim; the theological premise which undergirds the alleged poster has always been constant in christianity, at least as practised and believed in this country; which is namely, that the person of Jesus Christ, as the Son of God (jews and muslims would disagree), is the ONLY way to personal salvation (of the soul) and thus upon death, the ONLY way to an eternity in heaven. This means that in the perception of christians, buddhists, muslims, hindus and free thinkers are all DAMNED to an eternity in hell. Full stop.

 

Now, a conniving dishonesty comes when a non-christian confronts the christian in a media or national capacity.  It is common for the christian to make the non-sensical statement that it is not up to him to judge anyone – only god knows – the destiny of all men. No streetwise christian would be so daft as to state the truth point blank that the poor interviewer will be damned to hellfire. But this is a red herring which distracts the public from the real issue – what does christian theology teach?

 

Classical christian theology has always been religiously exclusive – there is only ONE TRUE religion – and ONE TRUE scripture. It is precisely this very deluded view that compels practitioners to proselytise non-christians as much as possible – they are really sincere about it – they want you to go to heaven!

 

So let me be clear. Any christian who claims that CCC is not representative of christianity is being deliberately dishonest.

 

In making this assertion, I am not claiming that no christian in Singapore disagrees with the bigoted exclusivity of classical christianity; there are perhaps many who do privately. But as an institution and a social movement in Singapore, christianity is religiously exclusive, and theoretically unaccepting towards other religious or nonreligious traditions.

 

There is no point in interviewing, let’s say, a spokesperson for the National Council of Churches in Singapore. Or some lecturer in Trinity Theological College Singapore. Folks like these do not represent the average church pastor, let alone the christian person on the street. In classic Singaporean style, bishops and theologians would offer politically correct and nuanced views on the matter, deflecting any potential conflict.

 

Politically correct spin are nothing but half-truths and testicle-licking lies.

 

Anyhow, the alleged poster is very tame by my book. Just drop by any of the tongue-speaking, hand-raising, demon-casting and chriss angel-like magic mumbo-jumbo charismatic megachurches in Singapore and you will see that Jesus Camp and Teen Mania is more closer to the truth than meets the eye.

 

*******

 

malaysian cowards

 

What makes me very cross time and again is the amount of injustice against humanity religious fundamentalism has caused, and often in the form of an Islam which only Saudi Arabia (and maybe a few other countries) advocates.

 

In the name of an all-merciful deity who loves chopping the heads off anyone who turns their back on him, Saudi Arabia wins the oscars for Most Stupid Government by policing laws as lowbrow as banning women from driving and voting and as inhumane as murdering anyone who says anything remotely critical of Islam or its founder.

 

This fanatical mob may soon be chopping the head off one of its countrymen, a young journalist, who happened to tweet something negative about the prophet Muhammad several days ago. Although he deleted his comments later, he has already made the holy men in his country very cross. Many is shouting for his blood.

 

Poor chap. He decides to flee to New Zealand, but is caught by the Malaysian authorities while in transit. As a fellow muslim country, it is its duty to kick the infidel’s ass all the way back to Arabia. Of course, the liars in Malaysia will not admit to the real reason behind the deportation and cooks up bullshit about not helping “fugitives”. What is the boy’s crime, by the way? Murder? Rape? Oh I see, it is only apostasy.

 

The malaysian home minister, a Mr Hussein, played down allegations that the journalist might be tortured and killed by calling the monarchy of madmen “respectable”. If Saudi Arabia is a respectable country, then Switzerland is paradise.

 

We should never kowtow to monsters like Wahabi Islam. But since Malaysia is doing business with the arabian kingdom, it is not a surprise. In fact, I suspect it may get many of its islamic resources from the kingdom as well. And this makes the Islam practised by Malaysia not as “moderate” as they would like us to believe.

 

*******

 

another stupid comment by evangelical

 

“Religion, indeed Christianity, was the driving force behind the abolition of slavery in Great Britain and the United States and was an essential center point of the civil rights movement in the Twentieth Century…”

- Craig Hazen, evangelical academic at Biola University

(source)

 

As ignorant as an evangelical as he already is, a christian academic at the baptist-related Biola University recently made the above comment in response to Richard Dawkins’ remark about enlightenment values at a literary festival in India.

 

It appears that Hazen is deliberately omitting the fact that it was also the brute force of christianity that was behind the whole slavery business in the first place – as well as the entire racism enterprise that elevates the caucasian above that of any other race on earth.

 

Besides, Martin Luther King Jr. was never an evangelical in the modern sense of the word and would never have endorsed the bigotry and silliness for which the evangelical world is so well known.

 

 

the british on yankee stupidity

 

Stephen Fry on American Cults

 

Here is Stephen Fry at his best, mocking the silliness of American religion.

 

*******

 

some stupid things christians say to atheists

 

1. “You’re an atheist? But you’re so nice!”

This remark presupposes the popular myth perpetuated by evangelicals that one cannot be morally good without god. The more philosophically nuanced argument would add the point that there could be no foundation or justification for being good if there is no absolute arbiter.

Both forms of the argument are a load of chicken droppings.

Morality is a product of human evolution as demonstrated by our nature as social and highly self-conscious animals. We do good or be nice to others for the sake of humankind – making the world a better place is beneficial and good for our own species. To me, that is a more worthy reason to be and do good than the fear of being punished by a tyrant in the sky.

 

2. “Your life must be bleak and meaningless. Why bother to live at all?”

Although there are atheists who think themselves into despair (more often than not, these folks were products of religious indoctrination as children), there are countless others who find great meaning in their lives through charity, the work that they do, family, relationships, love, etc. Many do not even think that “ultimate” meaning in life is necessary to be happy as ultimate meanings can be non-issues. Proximate meanings suffice.

 

3. “Do you believe in Satan?”

Yes, there are evangelicals who are that stupid. Atheism is simply the denial of an imaginary arbiter in the sky many call god. It doesn’t presuppose anything else. Besides, the majority of atheists deny any form of supernaturalism and that includes the fictional devil. Why would atheists believe in or worship Satan, for goodness’ sake? God, angels, satan and all that crap are the same thing – just crap.

 

4. “Why do you hate God?”

This is a twist on the previous remark and is equally daft. Atheists do not “hate” God because they do not even accept his existence. How do you hate an imaginary figure? Atheists simply reject the idea of a supernatural Supreme Being because they do not find sufficient evidence to do so. Period.

Atheists do not believe in god as much as they do not believe in telemarketing scams, tabloid news, amulets, superstition, folklore, etc. They might “hate” and detest the people propagating such lies as they detest the institutions that promote god – but let me repeat – they do not hate God.

 

5. “You’re just going through a phase.”

What phase? This remark is often made to people who have just seen the light and started to shake off the vestiges of fairy tales that have taken them captive for so long. Atheism is not an emotional downside which people go through – most of the time it is a rational and reasonable conclusion people make after considerable reflection, research and study.

 

6. “Have you ever read the bible?”

One of the most stupid remarks. Ever.

Most atheists know the bible more than any evangelical would ever be – I’ve known many evangelicals who don’t know anything about the history of their own religion, their denominations, their creeds, how and when the bible was written, etc. Some even think that the bible Jesus read was the King James Version!!

The fact that atheists are who they are proves that most of them have undergone periods of study and research into the religions and found them wanting. Many have studied the bible and realised it is just religious fiction.

 

7. “I’ll pray for you.”

Enough said. Please carry on your schizophrenic conversation with your imaginary friend and stop bothering me.

 

***

 

The stupid remarks are taken from Friendly Atheist blog.

 

*******

 

latest niv bible more explicitly bigoted

 

If the opinion of evangelical theologian Douglas Moo is anything to go by, one thing is made very clear, that christianity is as bigoted and archaic a religious tradition as any premodern and pre-scientific philosophy in the ancient world.

 

As one of the scholars who helped to produce the latest New International Version (NIV) edition, released in 2011, Moo claimed that this updated edition is even clearer about condemning homosexual practice. In all its forms.

 

Latest NIV Bible Translation Clearer on Homosexual Sins, says Theologian

 

He made this claim due to the fact that for decades, certain wishy-washy liberal christians have always insisted that verses such as 1 Corinthians 6:9 distinguishes between the “active” and “passive” participants in homosexual practice. In other words, whether one is doing the penetrating or the receiving, and that the New Testament condemns only the penetrators.

 

Anyhow, lava-boiling liberals like myself do not take that position. We simply rule away such passages as products of a bygone pre-scientific age that have no relevance for the 21st century, just as we rule away passages on slavery as well as genocide and human sacrifice. In fact, we consider ourselves as being consistently true to our rational faculties by ruling away moral codes that are contextually placed whereas evangelicals have the tendency to cherry-pick those that they want to keep and those that they label as bygone. Sheesh.

 

Anyhow, if Moo is to be believed, it just proves the point to many free thinkers and atheists that christianity is nothing more but a religion that is bigoted and evil.

 

*******

 

religious lunacy over the new year

 

Amid the generally humane merry-making over the two festive weekends, there were a few incidents which interrupted the good cheer with their irritatingly lunatic nature.

 

In the Israeli capital of Jerusalem, one ultra-orthodox Jewish bloke verbally abused a female Israeli soldier by calling her a SLUT when she refused to sit at the back of the public bus. This same man demanded another woman to return to the back of the bus when she was heading to the front to pay the bus driver her fare. The loony bloke apparently told the woman that “a woman shouldn’t pass through the front of the bus to pay.”

 

Apparently the ultra-orthodox Jews in the city have similar sexist issues with the fairer sex as their muslim counterparts in Saudi Arabia and certain regions of the Middle East and Africa, only worse. Even very young school girls who innocently walked past an ultra-orthodox Jewish settlement on the way to school were verbally abused by religious lunatics.

 

And people still believe that religion is a force for good?

 

And in Adelaide from down under, loony christians took to the streets to harass the public with their hate-filled preachings about hell and doom. The more enterprising among them even board public buses to preach! My goodness, when will this religious exclusivism stop??!

 

Not to be undone by the Judeo-Christian barminess, the chief Imam of Ghana delivered a Christmas message that was unlike any Christmas message one has ever heard. This demented monster of a bloke praised the religious leaders in Ghana for their “crusade” against homosexuality, urging them on not to give up the fight to eradicate homosexuality from the country.

 

And probably the worse of all was the bombings of churches in Nigeria on Christmas day by muslim fanatics which caused quite a number of deaths, to say the least. Really, although it would be contrary to the spirit of the Enlightenment and humanism, I sometimes wish the eradication of such extremist groups that go around killing innocent people for their religion, race or sexuality. And it is often during these moments in which I really wish there is a hell beyond the grave for these sanctimonious evil bastards to fry, sizzle and rot.

 

And since there isn’t, these bastards should be tortured before they die.

 

*******

 

evangelical bias

 

(source)

:) :) :)

 

self-imposed dilemmas of the religious loonies

 

Here is an interesting rant by the blogger of Forever in Hell about the warped ethics of christian loonies who, in my opinion, often create non-existent dilemmas of their own due to some twisted logic based on their sickly obsession with the bible.

 

Family Values, Indeed

 

I agree with her totally.

 

*******

 

the top ten signs that you’re a fundamentalist christian…

 

10. You vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, but feel outraged when someone denies the existence of yours.

 

9. You feel insulted and “dehumanized” when scientists say that people evolved from other life forms, but you have no problem with the Biblical claim that we were created from dirt.

 

8. You laugh at polytheists, but you have no problem believing in a Triune God.

 

7. Your face turns purple when you hear of the “atrocities” attributed to Allah, but you don’t even flinch when hearing about how God/Jehovah slaughtered all the babies of Egypt in “Exodus” and ordered the elimination of entire ethnic groups in “Joshua” including women, children and trees!

 

6. You laugh at Hindu beliefs that deify humans, and Greek claims about gods sleeping with women, but you have no problem believing that the Holy Spirit impregnated Mary, who then gave birth to a man-god that got killed, came back to life and then ascended into the sky.

 

5. You are willing to spend your life looking for little loopholes in the scientifically established age of the Earth (few billion years), but you find nothing wrong with believing dates recorded by Bronze Age tribesmen sitting in their tents and guessing that Earth is a few generations old.

 

4. You believe that the entire population of this planet with the exception of those who share your beliefs – though excluding those in all rival sects – will spend Eternity in an infinite Hell of Suffering. And yet consider your religion the most “tolerant” and “loving.”

 

3. While modern science, history, geology, biology and physics have failed to convince you otherwise, some idiot rolling around on the floor speaking in “tongues” may be all the evidence you need to “prove” Christianity.

 

2. You define 0.01% as a “high success rate” when it comes to answered prayers. You consider that to be evidence that prayer works. And you think that the remaining 99.99% FAILURE was simply the will of God.

 

1. You actually know a lot less than many atheists and agnostics do about the Bible, Christianity and church history – but still call yourself a Christian.

 

:) ;) :) ;) :)

 

(source)

 

*******

 

“islam, charles darwin and the denial of science”

by Steve Jones

 

A few years ago I had an operation to repair a hernia. In that I shared the experience of about one in four British men of my age, in whom a section of intestine breaks through the body wall to form an unpleasant, and potentially dangerous, bulge in the groin. The job was done quickly and efficiently by a surgeon who had, no doubt, done it hundreds of times before.

 

But why is that procedure needed so often? The story began long ago, when our ancestors were fish. In those happy days the testes were deep within the main body mass, close to the liver (as they still are in our marine cousins). They were connected to the outside world by a pair of straight tubes. Then came the move on to land and the shift from cold blood to warm. That had lots of advantages, but faced the unfortunate male with a problem, for the delicate machinery for making sperm works best at low temperatures, perhaps to reduce the number of errors made as DNA is copied.

 

The solution was a messy compromise in which the testes migrated south and emerged in their present form in an elegant external sac (which makes them, as I never fail to point out to students, both literally and figuratively the coolest part of any man’s body). To make the journey, the tubes had to loop around some of the bones of the pubic girdle and to pass close to the surface of the body to make a weak point where, now and again, the intestine makes a break for freedom.

 

Hernias, then, are the result of the imperfect process of evolution, of the slow accumulation of successful mistakes and of the inevitable pressure of compromise. A surgeon may not need to know that and the first hernia operations were carried out well before The Origin of Species by people who had no idea why the problem arose; and (although I doubt it) perhaps my own doctor was equally ignorant.

 

Now, though, we have evolution, the grammar of biology. More and more, students do not like it. I no longer teach medics but I do have a lot of contact with biology undergraduates and go to many schools and to student conferences. Over the past decade there has grown up a determined denial by many people of the truths of modern science.

 

At University College London we have numbers of Islamic students, almost all dedicated, hard-working and able. Some, unfortunately, refuse to accept Darwin’s theory on faith grounds, as do some of their Christian fellows; and just a couple of years ago a Turkish anti-evolution speaker (a Dr Babuna, as I remember) was invited on to campus to give an account of why The Origin is wrong. He was the scion of an extraordinary – and very rich – anti-evolution organisation based in his native land that has sent out thousands of lavishly illustrated creationist books and has linked Darwinism to Nazism and worse.

 

Much of their propaganda has been lifted from Christian fundamentalism and there is a certain irony in where it has ended up. I have had plenty of verbal complaints from undergraduates of both persuasions that I am demeaning religion, while others ask that they be excused lectures on my subject, or simply fail to turn up.

 

In schools things are worse: some kids will walk out rather than listen. Their teachers can be just as bad. The most virulent attack I have had in recent years came from a physics teacher in a respected north London state school, who – to the embarrassment of his colleagues – barracked my talk on evolutionary biology with repeated statements that Darwinism contradicted the laws of thermodynamics. I was forced, uncharacteristically, to be rude.

 

Anyone, of course, is free to believe whatever they wish. But why train to become a biologist, or a doctor, when you deny the very foundations of your subject? For a biology student to refuse to accept the fact of evolution is equivalent to choosing to do a degree in English without believing in grammar, or in physics with a rooted objection to gravity: it makes no sense at all. The same is true for doctors. How can you put a body right with no idea as to why it is liable to go wrong?

 

I have tried asking students at quite what point they find my lectures unacceptable: is it the laws of inheritance, mutation, the genes that protect against malaria or cancer, the global shifts in human skin colour, Neanderthal DNA, or the inherited differences between apes and men? Each point is, they say, very interesting – but when I point out that they have just accepted the whole truth of Darwin’s theory they deny that frightful thought. Some take instant umbrage, although a few, thank goodness, do leave the room with a pensive look.

 

The problem is not with any particular belief system but with belief itself. Sir Francis Bacon once said that: “If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end in doubts; but if he will be content to begin with doubts, he shall end in certainties.” In other words, if you are absolutely sure that you are right whatever the evidence, you will end up in trouble; but if you are always willing to change your mind when the facts change you will emerge with a robust view of how the world works.

 

I sometimes wonder how many of those who pour their inane opinions about creationism into their young pupils’ ears ever consider the damage they are doing; not to my science, but to their religion. Why, when a student begins to learn the simple and convincing facts, rather than the fantasies, about how life emerged, should he believe anything else that his pastor, his rabbi or his imam has told him? Why build a philosophy based on fixed untruths, when we have so many truths, and so many things still to find out?

 

The growing tide of fact‑denial is a statement of failure, not by students but by their teachers, up to and including those at university level. We do our best, I think, but faced with schools or faith groups that get their ignorance in first, we seem to be fighting a losing battle. Just a few weeks ago I gave a talk to sixth-formers entitled, provocatively, “Why evolution is right and creationism is wrong”. We had a vigorous discussion at the end in which one lad got me on the back foot by insisting, rightly, that the whole of science is based on uncertainty and that I could not, as a scientist, use a phrase such as “Why evolution is right”. As a compromise I suggested that I would henceforth call the talk: “Why evolution is probably right, and creationism is certainly wrong”. Somehow, I think that will not solve the problem.

 

***

 

This article was written by former Emeritus Professor of Human Genetics, Steve Jones, at University College London and first published in The Telegraph UK on 3 December 2011.

 

*******

 

this is why I am so pissed off with fundamentalists…

 

It seems that the numbers are growing, albeit slowly but steadily. And it is a problem to science education in the UK.

 

More and more muslim undergraduates in biology and medicine are avoiding classes on evolution because they perceived the subject to be contradictory to their religious understanding of the world.

 

Creationism, that is.

 

Muslim Medics boycott Lectures on Darwin and Evolution

 

It used to be christian loonies, but now it is the growing loony muslim population in the UK, which somehow always appear to grow via immigration from Pakistan and similar countries. And their version of Islam is loony indeed.

 

Now – even IF one rejects the fact of evolution for fairy tales – there is no harm in learning about an alternative viewpoint. In fact, if creationists want to promote their pseudo-science more effectively, they should learn NOT to make lame arguments against a caricatured form of evolution that evolutionists never teach in the first place.

 

British muslims should learn from intellectuals like Usama Hassan, an imam at a mosque in East London who recently suggested that darwinian evolution and islam is compatible.

 

Alas, as is the common practice among the ignorant muslim throng these days, Hassan received death threats and pseudo-fatwas for his scientific views.

 

Sigh…Britain should somehow BAN the Saudi Arabian brand of Wahabhi islam from entering its shores – it is this idiotic country that is responsible for propagating much of the nonsense in Islam which we see in the media today. Islam would do better without Saudi Arabia and its lunatics.

 

*******

 

the epitome of idiocy

 

There is no rational justification for the criminalisation of women driving except male chauvinism gone bonkers. And in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the only nation in the whole beautiful world that does so, it is not a surprise. It is a society notorious for its male chauvinistic culture and obsession with sex. Apparently the male species in Saudi Arabia have so high a libido that a mere glance at the beautiful eyes of a woman can send them to the moon and back.

 

And probably with semen in their trousers too.

 

The reasons for the ban? ACADEMICS from the nation’s highest religious council opined that allowing women to drive would:

 

“…provoke a surge in prostitution, pornography, homosexuality and divorce.”

 

This is one of the silliest and most idiotic reasoning I have ever come across in my life – even fundamentalists in the US bible belt would not make such a claim. How on earth can women driving to the nearby supermarket lead to homosexuality??? How in the name of heaven can women driving their kids to school lead to them becoming prostitutes???

 

Allowing women drivers in Saudi Arabia will be “end of virginity”

 

It is STUPIDITY like these which result in the rampant media assassination of the Islamic religion. Readers should be discerning enough to separate fact from looniness.

 

*******

 

what religious fundamentalism is

 

 

:) :) :)

 

where religion has gone nuts

 

Welcome to a world where fantasy and reality collide, a world where Halloween becomes real and zombies walked the earth. It is not Universal Studios at Sentosa.

 

Welcome to the world of the Vatican.

 

 

…and the deluded mind of its former CHIEF exorcist, a Father Gabriele Amorth.

 

I would rather leave him alone with his schizophrenia but when loony religion starts to impose itself on the wider culture, that is where I get pissed.

 

This old man was at a film festival about two weeks ago introducing the US film, The Rite, which is about exorcism, when he made these comments:

 

“Practising yoga is satanic, it leads to evil just like reading Harry Potter.”

“In Harry Potter the Devil acts in a crafty and covert manner, under the guise of extraordinary powers, magic spells and curses.”

Not surprisingly, one of the favourite films of this 86-year-old priest is the 1973 classic, The Exorcist, which also happened to be one of my favourites as well, although I contend that the plot is nothing but fantasy and the fruits of the human imagination. Of course, the producers of the film claimed that the story was based loosely on actual events of which the demonic protagonist was in fact a boy of Lutheran parents – but anecdotes like these are never to be accepted hook, line and sinker.

 

‘Harry Potter and Yoga are evil,’ says Catholic Church exorcist

 

Anyhow, the notion that yoga has dodgy origins is not unique to the Vatican. There are many evangelical christian books in the market that espouse a similar nonsense – and some of these books claim that even the Roman Catholic Church is one big demonic enterprise, the pope being the Anti-Christ!? And of course, the equally ridiculous myth that the visions of the prophet Muhammad (pbuh) were inspired by the devil and that the poor Arab might have been epileptic.

 

There are still churches in Singapore (some of them megachurches) which still hold on to an animistic and premodern belief that many of our vices and “bad habits” can be caused by evil spirits and demons – and would often conduct healing services where an expert in “deliverance ministry” (the evangelical term for exorcism) would try to cast out “demons of lust, demons of smoking, demons of masturbation, demons of pornography, demons of doubt, demons of violence, demons of anger,” etc…and parishioners would then be seen vomiting (as a sign of the demon leaving the body), convulsing on the floor, screaming, etc.

 

And mind you – they are not being metaphorical.

 

And the government of Singapore beware – such books are aplenty in bookshops all across our small island – and circulated within the evangelical community here. Grassroots christianity in Singapore is not as civil and religiously tolerant as the National Council of Churches Singapore want us to believe – many do not view the other religious faiths in a good light.

 

Am I making a sweeping statement? No – I myself am still part of the community!!!

 

*******

 

biblical sexism

 

 

*******

 

superstar mary is in town

 

In a queue which stretched for miles in the chilling winds of a russian night, tens of thousands at any one time were quietly waiting for their turn.

 

It was a queue that tech entrepreneurs would die for and companies like Apple would pay millions for. Alas, it wasn’t an iPhone 5. It wasn’t some new cutting edge tech toy. In fact, the product which lured the crowds out for almost a week was something as ancient as first century Palestine.

 

 

It was a glass-covered reliquary believed to have held the belt belonging to a first century Jewish peasant girl by the name of Miryam, more popularly known as Mary, the only woman in legend to have been the human mother of God as well as one who apparently never had sex.

 

And the Eastern Orthodox church reveres the artefact for its magical powers – renown to have healed women of infertility as well as cure numerous illnesses. It seems that the eastern cousins of the more well known Roman Catholic variety, although split for more than a millennium over the issue of Jesus as well as the authority of the Pope, still retain the somewhat superstitious penchant for human fossils and ancient belongings.

 

The belt is actually a superstar of sorts, having reached St Petersburg on 20 October from a orthodox monastery in Greece. It has just finished its month-long tour in the former communist nation that is not far behind the US for its religiosity.

 

In Russian Chill, Waiting Hours for Touch of the Holy

 

Russians wait in 5-km line to touch Virgin Mary relic

 

Unlike the majority of germans whose collective encounters with communism as well as the atrocities of the Nazi campaign during the second world war made them relinquish any hope of a supposedly benevolent deity; the Russians seemed to be doing the opposite by having their religiosity strengthened in recent times. Whether or not one agrees with their brand of faith, with its charms, talismans and relics, one cannot deny that religion is still a growing reality in the lives of many people in the 21st century.

 

And it is very unlikely to disappear any time soon.

 

*******

 

 

baker in iowa refuses to do business with lesbian couple

 

 

Victoria Childress is an unassuming and mild-mannered baker who operates a bakery business from her home in Des Moines, Iowa. Unknown to many, she is also a card-carrying evangelical christian.

 

And in the 21st century, “evangelical christian” often spells homophobic and religiously exclusive bigot.

 

True to her bloodwashed heritage, Childress was tossed into the spotlight by refusing to do business with a couple upon finding out about their sexual tastes. In this case, a fine taste for labias and vaginas.

 

Wedding Cake Battle brews between Couple, Baker

 

No – the duo were not promiscuous men – but two women who loved each other and wanted to take the next step in their relationship by getting married. They wanted to order a wedding cake for their big day scheduled for June next year and were at Childress’ bakery for a cake-tasting session when the mild-mannered bigot asked one of them if the other was her sister.

 

When she replied that the other lass was her partner, the devil came out of Childress.

 

Dressed in an angel of light, of course. With all the niceties about being true to one’s convictions, yadda yadda.

 

Many would support Childress and her “right” as an owner of a private business to choose whom she would do business with but I contend that as a baker, she is offering a PUBLIC SERVICE and as such should not discriminate against customers based solely on who they are as human beings. Just like owners of hotels and B&Bs should not prohibit LGBT couples from using their facilities.

 

Otherwise, Childress should have made it absolutely clear to potential customers by advertising her discriminatory tendencies on her website or her house front.

 

Theology aside, one wonders what would Jesus himself do in Childress’ place? Would he refuse the LGBT community from participating in the Eucharist? Would he ban them from becoming members of His body? Would he curse them to hell just because He himself created them that way?

 

Hmm…

 

*******

 

what evangelicals really think about Islam

 

I’m the one they’re after. I’m “the enemy,” the believer in the “false idol,” “the darkness” Jesus needs to cast out of America, the reason they’re spending all night in Detroit’s Ford Field, sending prayers over Michigan mosques “like sending special forces into Afghanistan.” And there are thousands of them, come because Pastor Lou Engle asked them to.

 

Founder of TheCall, Engle warns that an Islamic movement is rising in Dearborn, Michigan—“Ground Zero” for America’s spiritual future (and site of a new TLC reality show, All-American Muslim). When I heard the goals for TheCall Detroit—healing America in a time of crisis, accomplishing racial reconciliation, and (here’s where I come in) bringing Jesus to Muslim hearts—I figured a Muslim in the crowd could be a nice twist.

 

So I was there with them for hours into the late night and hearing their ex-Muslim speaker ridiculously early in the morning, the undercover Muslim surrounded by tens of thousands beside me, praying for Jesus to invade my heart. My plan was to report from the inside, to talk to the attendees as one among devoted thousands (though probably not revealing my religious background, unless I had to and knew where the exits were).

 

I’d observe firsthand what goes on at a gathering like this. I’d try to understand how such Christians understand Islam. Lou Engle’s world is alien from my New England roots and New York life. I’d attended churches before, but nothing like this. We need to know where this fear and hate come from, what its intentions are, and who it appeals to.

 

But as the day approached, Engle’s connections to a network of right-wing activists and political Christians came into focus. From the involvement of US Army Lt. Gen. William Boykin (who has helpfully compared Islam to a diabolical religion), to a Michigan Call coordinator named Rick Warzywak (who believes that Christians should “go back and occupy or take back the land” of American Muslims), to a particularly weird twist on the theme of racial reconciliation (involving sending Detroit’s African-American Muslims, or ex-Muslims, to the Middle East), it was clear that this might be an uncomfortable assignment.

 

So I shaved my beard down to a goatee. Just in case.

 

But that anxiety only confirmed the importance of what I was doing. I needed to see this for myself. Americans, and American Muslims especially, need to know how certain interpretations of professedly apolitical Christianity become allied to a far-right agenda of foreign wars and domestic austerity, glorifying the rich while demonizing the poor.

 

Political Christianity’s treatment of Islam is one of the few points, and perhaps the only point, at which right-wing, political Christianity’s radical agenda is revealed, for its attitude to Islam speaks both to the narrowness of its domestic vision (America for certain Americans) and the aggressiveness of its foreign vision (going abroad to find monstrous Muslims to convert). Don’t let the language of love fool you.

 

A Pep Rally for Jesus

I was sure I’d be one of very few non-white folks in attendance, yet when the gates opened on Friday afternoon, I was struck by the diversity—and the juvenile vibe. I took my seat close to the stage, surrounded by people of every color, finding it hard to focus because of the pounding Christian rock music shaking the stadium. Folks were on their feet, dancing and swaying. Rather than stick out, I blended in perfectly.

 

People have tried to compare Islamophobia to old-school racism. And I’ve repeatedly disagreed. We have a tendency to accuse arguments rooted in religion and tradition of reaching back to the past; the truth, however, is much more complicated. As much as religion shapes the world, it is shaped by the world. Even when we invoke the past, we must accommodate the language and conclusions of today. Just fifty years ago, Herman Cain and Michele Bachmann would not have been viable candidates. Hell, they wouldn’t have been candidates at all. And so too with TheCall.

 

The rally formally opened with a Native American band (actually, since they were Canadian, a First Nations band). Everybody seemed into it, on their feet and swaying to the beat. Judging by those first hours, this was worship at the altar of a multicultural Jesus, advertising its many ethnicities, stressing the need for racial reconciliation and forgiveness, encouraging populations pushed apart by suspicion to come together in Jesus’ name. I found it encouraging and I found it worrying.

 

The diversity was nice. Different languages were spoken on the stage, many different ethnicities were represented. But that diversity could be used to excuse a more subversive intolerance, all the harder to detect for the polyglot multiplicity. It’s not so different from how, since the 1960s, consumer culture has appropriated the language of diversity, and even its attitude, without dealing with its underlying and democratic point. And so we have elite institutions that are ever more racially diverse, who increasingly deploy people of different colors and backgrounds in their advertising and hierarchies, even while social mobility goes into steep decline and the middle class is eviscerated.

 

I’m sure Engle believes in a Christian movement that transcends race, to reach around the world. Just as I’m sure he’d be greatly pleased by my conversion to his Christianity. But this misses the deeper point, the truly political and partisan nature of TheCall; I saw this as far more than a spiritual exercise in part, I think, because I was forced to process what was happening around me as an outsider. Because, after all, religions are not interchangeable, like different color cars of the same make and model.

 

Raised in Sunni Muslim tradition, I always experienced worship as the effort to establish an immediate, intimate, and contemplative connection with God; in Sunni mysticism, observing the law is a necessary condition of spirituality. I say this not to establish distance, or to enforce division, but to draw our attention to how religion can be either a source of strength or a source of harm. To make a long point short, Islam is a religion of moral law; when the institutions that produce its legal scholars (who are, ideally, also spiritual authorities) are subverted, undercut, or simply insufficiently rigorous, the resulting interpretations of law become irrelevant—or dangerous.

 

Keeping that in mind, I found TheCall was immediately shocking.

 

A friend called a few hours in, concerned that I might be kidnapped (I’m sure he was joking—I hope), and asked what I made of the whole thing. And the first thing that came to mind was: “It’s like a pep rally for Jesus.”

 

So that Jesus Might Invade Their Dreams

Even when there were speakers, they were bookended by passionate music, deeply emotional calls to prayer, folks spontaneously joining hands and forming prayer circles, turning not to established rituals but whatever the moment led them to. A man behind me started speaking in tongues, and within a few hours, people were fainting and falling to the ground. I had never experienced anything like it.

 

But with all the transport out of and away from yourself, there was little time to digest what the speakers were saying, little time to think through the implications of their exhortations. In fairness, that didn’t seem to be a problem right away. As I said, the first few hours seemed to be a public relations dream come true; I heard little overtly anti-Muslim sentiment (and no mention of homosexuality).

 

A look at the program confirmed why. The section titled “Dearborn Awakening” was dumped in dead time, 3 a.m. to 6 a.m. Since Dearborn is home to many Arabs and Muslims, as well as one of the largest mosques in America (a Twelver Shi’a mosque, incidentally), I knew this must be the part of TheCall that would confront Islam. Likely the organizers wanted to shift the more controversial stuff to when nobody would be paying attention; according to Rachel Maddow, this might also have been in the hope that, with Michigan Muslims asleep, Jesus might invade their dreams.

 

Engle underestimated this Muslim’s desire to see through the subterfuge.

 

I left Ford Field after five hours, frankly exhausted by the emotional commitment requested by TheCall. A friend took me to an Arab restaurant, where all the waitresses wore hijab. That, and seeing Arabic signs and advertisements everywhere, only fifteen minutes from Ford Field, was pleasingly jarring (and strategically reassuring: In case things turned ugly, I knew where to run, and had a reasonable sense of how fast).

 

I explained to one of the friendly, all-American, veiled waitresses what I was doing in Dearborn. She seemed skeptical. So I shared TheCall’s promotional literature, and she was stunned. This poor girl hadn’t realized she was part of any “Islamic movement in America” (in America, but not “American”). That night, I spoke to other Muslims about TheCall. They were either deeply concerned or just shrugged it off. As of Friday night, I would’ve been with the second group.

 

At midnight, I was back in my hotel, stuffed full of shish tawouk, Arab pastries, and chai. I took a two-hour nap, and then went back for more.

 

Like the Muslim Brotherhood

The Muslim Brotherhood used to have a popular slogan: “Islam is the solution” (Islam huwa al-hall). “Jesus is the answer” is the same kind of sloganeering. I’m not just saying that because I know it would drive Engle nuts. It is an overly and therefore problematically easy answer to some very knotty problems. And hearing Engle insist on this point brought me back to the very format of TheCall, which rushes through speakers, condenses their points, and squishes them between loud music and unreflectively emotional appeals. There’s little time to ponder what it means for America if only Jesus can solve our problems.

 

In an introduction found in the event program, Engle wrote:

Revolution is in the air. But the revolution that is needed is not a revolution of snarling protesters or angry mobs; it’s a Jesus revolution, a revolution of forgiveness, racial reconciliation, compassion.

 

It’s one thing if he genuinely disavowed politics, but time and time again his supposedly apolitical efforts have an undeniable political goal. In fact TheCall is deeply and suspiciously political, and—at least here he is honest—revolutionary. It seeks to heal America by making a different America in its place, one whose moral conversation displaces its political discourse, one whose reference point is Jesus. Rick Perry’s prayer rally The Response was modeled on Engle’s interpretation of the solemn assembly described in Joel 2, which in turn shaped TheCall. Engle himself has traveled to Sacramento, Washington, and Kampala to praise efforts to restrict the rights of LGBT people and has led elected Republicans in a prayer session that predicted God would punish America for passing health care reform.

 

But most relevant here was the vacuity of the content: The solution to America’s great crisis was prayer, from start to end, and apparently little else. Any religiosity that encourages worship without broader social engagement—non-Christians were barely acknowledged over the course of an event designed to heal America’s profound crisis—while allying with those who seek to do away with much of our government is anything but apolitical. It just doesn’t have the courage to admit it.

 

Engle argues that America is in crisis. So do a lot of folks. But then he argues that the only way out is through Jesus. Undoubtedly every political and social crisis has a moral dimension, though to admit that means little. What matters more is to think this logic through: How will we solve political and social crises if we read them through religious lenses? While a universalized, transnational Christianity has its appeal, it doesn’t leave much room for other Americans—or America as a political project. The more I listened to Engle diagnosing America’s problems, the more I thought of old-school Islamists.

 

Moozlums Allergic To Jesus

Of course, I had come to hear what TheCall would say about Muslims. Engle’s disavowal of any political agenda is, on this point, either evidence of duplicity or naiveté. We are at war in numerous Muslim-majority countries, facing an America in fiscal crisis, fighting a magnificently costly war on terrorism with no defined end, and watching a movement to ban Shari’ah law to save the Constitution while our civil liberties are increasingly challenged. There is no way that any conversation about Islam in America cannot have political implications. Long story short, I’m glad I was wide awake and raptly attentive at 3 a.m.

 

“Dearborn Awakening” began with a preacher who could not pronounce “Muslim.” He seemed to think it was “Mooz-lum.” I wanted to raise my hand to correct him, but everyone else had his or her hands raised (for different reasons). In the singing, one of the chorus lines was “Gather the remnants/among the Muslims”—a reference to the remnant of Christians remaining during the Tribulation who will evangelize the non-Christians so they will be saved before Jesus’ return. Another speaker clued us in on Jesus’ attitude to the Muslims: “You love them, and there’s nothing they can do about that.” Leave it to TheCall to make love sound alarming, even terrifying.

 

But the best was yet to come, and his name was Kamal.

 

Kamal was the reason we were here (and awake). I didn’t know who Kamal was, and would only later learn his identity, although while he was speaking, I suspected he was a fraud. (I’m not the only one who finds Kamal Saleem dubious). Kamal introduced himself as an ex-terrorist, which usually makes me wonder, considering how others have made lucrative careers profiting from ignorance, paranoia, and naïveté. (Imagine how much money I could make as a “former Muslim” on the incestuous right-wing circuit. I’m imagining it right now, and am mildly depressed.)

 

I’m not saying Kamal Saleem is definitely a fraud; it may simply be that he was raised by one of the dumbest Muslim families in the world.

 

Kamal claimed that he was raised in “jihad” in Lebanon, and kindly shared the implications with an audience that knew no better. For example, he said, when a Muslim’s blood is first shed in the path of God, he becomes a Messiah. (Unfortunately for Kamal, there is only one Messiah in Islam, and it’s Jesus—who, to take the previous speaker’s logic to its conclusion, loves us even if Lou Engle doesn’t want him to.) Kamal then told us that Islam teaches that there is only one way to go to heaven, and that is war. In fact, he shared many “facts,” the full effect of which was to convince the audience that Islam is purely demonic. Indeed, numerous references were made to “the darkness,” “the enemy,” and “false idols,” oblique enough to avoid outright outrage, but obvious enough to anyone more than half awake.

 

Stressing his Muslim credentials, Kamal said that one of his uncles was “the holiest of holies,” the Muslim Pope. There is no Muslim Pope, though to be fair, Kamal’s uncle might just have been lying to the poor boy. Kamal then told us that he was recruited by the Muslim Brotherhood and the PLO (a secular organization) and went on his first mission into Israel—we’re assuming that this was a military operation—at the age of seven. At the age of eight, he went on his second mission. Years later, when he first met Christians in America, Kamal was repulsed. His initial reaction was: “I’m allergic to Jesus.” (The audience loved this part.) Unfortunately for the supposed former Muslim, nobody taught Kamal that a Muslim who does not honor Jesus is by the consensus of every school in Islam not a Muslim.

 

Kamal then turned his sharp mind to theology, and distinguished the Muslim concept of God from the Christian, arguing that what Muslims believe in is a false idol. Christians, on the other hand, believe in the true God of love. Nobody told Kamal that one of Islam’s ninety-nine names of God is al-Wadud, the Loving, and that many other names express compassion, mercy, and forgiveness. Pretty much everything Kamal praised about the “Christian” God, short of the Trinity, could easily square with Islam’s understanding of the Divine: God is loving, forgiving, merciful, and personally concerned with us. Kamal closed with his conversion story, and a reminder that since converting, Saudi Arabia, the PLO, and the Muslim Brotherhood had all put a price on his head.

 

All the friendly diversity from Friday night, the warm and smiley openness, had vanished. Love and freedom were convenient catchphrases justifying the identification of nearly one-quarter of humanity with the demonic. It’s one thing to say that you’d like Muslims to convert to Christianity. Fair enough. Many Muslims want Christians to convert to Islam. It’s another thing to so brazenly misrepresent Islam. Conflicts in the past could be safely broached, but when it came to today’s war on terror, the disingenuousness and ill-spiritedness of choosing a former Muslim with the worst possible perspective on Islam revealed Engle’s agenda and its overlap with fearmongering Islamophobes.

 

After Kamal, there was mostly prayer and music, and prayerful music, until 6 a.m., at which time the first prayer of the day came in (I prayed at the hotel, just to be safe). Afterwards I took a long nap and came back to TheCall by late morning. But by then much had changed. Ford Field, which at best was half full, was empty and dulled. And it was hard to talk to people. Folks were friendly, but rarely chatty—though to do them justice, most of them were fasting, and probably hadn’t slept the night. The conversations I had with participants and performers were generally rushed. I didn’t want to be too obvious by raising the topic of Islam, and so it never came up.

 

Meanness of Spirit

Even back at the hotel, I didn’t get much traction. Most folks focused on the intensity of the experience, although my coming all the way from New York intrigued some. While taking a shower on Sunday morning, I heard a man in the room next door passionately scream Jesus’ name, but on reflection, that might have been something else entirely. There wasn’t much else to do, and I wanted the other side of the story. Saturday afternoon, I headed for Dearborn’s giant mosque, the Islamic Center of America, where I spent an hour asking the folks I met what they thought about TheCall. One activist noted that he hadn’t made any initiative to reach out to Engle; as an African American, he noted, he wouldn’t reach out to David Duke. For him, Engle was another piece of the Islamophobia puzzle.

 

After praying at sundown—the first time, incidentally, I’ve prayed in a Twelver Shi’a mosque (this trip was full of new religious experiences)—I visited a mosque in Rochester Hills, this one mostly South Asian and Sunni, where I was also able to get some local Muslims’ reactions to TheCall. There was of course concern, and some surprise. Many had heard, but many had not. More of the Muslims were more interested in hearing what it was like to be there. I’d live-tweeted TheCall and issued far too many Facebook updates, so some looked for clarification or explanation of certain points. I went back to the hotel by midnight and fell asleep fast, and didn’t begin to reflect on the whole experience until Sunday morning.

 

I was naturally disheartened, considering that the participants probably thought Kamal Saleem represented Islam. But on the drive to the airport that disappointment lifted. America is in crisis, as Engle warned, but its solution can be intimated in the popular energy that has animated engagement from Wisconsin to Wall Street to Tahrir—on the way to the airport, I drove past Occupy Detroit.

 

Our imaginations are once more open, as we consider the incompatibilities of unchecked capital and genuine democracy. In this time of reconstructing the way our world works, a polarizing and exclusive religious vision is not particularly relevant. America is also inescapably and increasingly diverse, and its domestic and foreign policy requires finding a method of engagement with difference that is reasonable and respectful.

 

But there is a more inescapable truth about Engle’s “Dearborn Awakening.” He chose a speaker who lied, obfuscated, and confused. Should any of the participants want to learn more about Islam, if even to bring Jesus to Muslims, they have already heard the worst of the worst. And they’ll quickly find out that Islam is very different from what they were told it is. All the passionate music, jubilation, and spiritual energy cannot hide the meanness of spirit that would perpetrate this kind of fraud.

 

As much as TheCall prayed for “Jesus to cover Dearborn in light, and cast out the darkness,” Kamal Saleem was the one speaking in the dead of night. Engle should pay more attention to his own moralizing etiology of America’s crisis. Democracy, like a free-market economy, operates on trust, and when that trust is lost, it is very hard to recover. The relationship of the faithful with their leaders is much the same. Those many thousands who were clearly lied to on Saturday morning will find out. Perhaps not immediately. But eventually. And then they’ll begin to wonder what else was a lie.

 

Be careful, Lou Engle.

 

***

 

This article was written by Haroon Moghul, associate editor at Religion Dispatches as well as a fellow at The Institute for Social Policy and Understanding. It was published in Religion Dispatches magazine on 16 November 2011.

 

*******

 

homophobic indoctrination from sunday school curriculum

 

As a Southern Baptist child I was taught that homosexuality was wrong. That lesson did not come from fiery anti-gay sermons from the pulpit. No one ever quoted any scriptures to prove it, and it was never, ever mentioned in Sunday School lessons. Instead, it just seemed to be common knowledge. Oh, for the good old days when the gays weren’t so uppity and open.

 

Today, teenagers in many Southern Baptist churches are hearing about homosexuality through a curriculum called “Known.” The scope of the curriculum—produced by the SBC’s publishing arm LifeWay—includes the usual subjects: Bible study, prayer, Jesus, peer pressure, and self-image. One module, however, stands out for its sheer nastiness. The module on homosexuality (contained in the Insights, Options, Bonus section of Known 13) reads like something that could have been produced by the Family Research Council or Americans for Truth About Homosexuality. That is to say, it’s completely hateful.

 

I am horrified by this development. But also oddly heartened…

 

I am horrified because teenagers coming to terms with their sexuality will be told that homosexuality is “vile and shameful” and “against God’s design for godly, holy living.” They will also be told that gay and lesbian people “consistently choose what is morally wrong.” These teens are also treated to such passages as this:

 

The term “one flesh,” speaks against the current culture’s lie that a person can enjoy casual sex. There is no casual sex in God’s view. One-flesh unions are created in sex, either as a beautiful thing in marriage or as a grotesque thing like a Frankenstein monster apart from marriage. Such is the ugliness of homosexuality.

 

Besides the offensiveness of comparing loving, committed same-sex relationships to a “grotesque” Frankenstein monster, the unit also cites data (as blogger Alvin McEwen has pointed out) from a study of a tiny group of white gay men—from 1978:

 

Statistics tell us that on average 43 percent of homosexuals have more than 500 sexual partners in their lifetime, and only one percent of homosexuals have had four or less sexual partners in their lifetime.

 

Researchers Alan P. Bell and Martin S. Weinberg even warn in their study that

 

“given the variety of circumstances which discourage homosexuals from participating in research studies, it is unlikely that any investigator will ever be in a position to say that this or that is true of a given percentage of all homosexuals.”

 

But, the creators of Known are not interested in letting the facts get in the way of scaring the hell out of young people who may be struggling with their sexuality. They simply want to drive home the message that homosexuality is “vile” and all gay people are morally suspect not just in their sexuality but apparently in every aspect of their lives.

 

But this is exactly why this curriculum causes me to take heart. This particular unit stands out like a sore thumb from the rest of the material that I have seen. Units on racism and being Christ’s salt and light in the world are gentle in tone, assuring teenagers that all people, no matter their race, status, or religion, are all equal before God.

 

The racism unit, especially, is gentle from start to finish, admonishing the students to love everyone, no matter what. In stark contrast, the homosexuality unit degrades and debases gays and lesbians—and loving them is only mentioned in the last paragraph.

 

We must also choose to love people in spite of their sin. If we love people, we will seek ways to share the gospel with them. What steps will you take to share the gospel with people you know who are enslaved to sexual sin?  

 

Got that? Love them—by sharing the condemnation that you have just learned.

 

But, what this unit ultimately reveals is that the Southern Baptists know their arguments against homosexuality are weak. Whenever you resort to name calling and demonization, you have already conceded the fight. They cannot make a reasoned, fact-based argument against homosexuality, so they resort to distortions and scare tactics. That’s always a dead giveaway for a losing argument.

 

I wonder how teenagers—already steeped in positive gay portrayals on television (think Glee) and in movies, and already friends with plenty of kids who have gay or lesbian parents, or who are gay or lesbian themselves—will reconcile this unit with their experience. Some will certainly take the SBC bait, hook, line, and sinker, becoming the anti-gay zealots of the next generation. But for others, this may be the unit that pushes them away from the church—especially those closeted teens—and that is sad. Still others—those struggling teens, perhaps—could even be driven to suicide by this hateful and bullying lesson.

 

The angry tone of this unit undercuts the wisdom of another unit that concludes with a quote from renowned religion scholar Robert Bellah:

 

“We should not underestimate the significance of the small group of people who have a new vision of a just and gentle world. The quality of a culture may be changed when two percent of its people have a new vision.”

 

Hopefully, some of these SBC teens will come to understand that demonization and condemnation will never result in “a just and gentle world.”

 

***

 

This article was written by Candace Chellew-Hodge, a pastor at Jubilee Circle United Church of Christ and published in Religion Dispatches on 8th November 2011.

 

*******

 

jesus camp for teens

 

This is Jesus Camp for teenagers, aptly named Teen Mania. You can click on the link below for the documentary on the christian ministry.

 

Teens Mania

 

It has often been said that the media has a penchant for misrepresentation and exaggeration, especially when it comes to religious critique. Evangelical christians would often claim that the media has misrepresented their views, misrepresented their particular churches, yadda yadda.

 

But is it really the case?

 

It is my firm contention that it is precisely the “outsider” perspective of the media which makes investigative journalism a more reliable method of getting to the truth of things, especially when it comes to controversial religious groups. The provocative Jesus Camp documentary was no misrepresentation of a lot of what really happens in christian camps all across the United States and EVEN in Singapore.

 

It is typical of evangelical christianity, and especially its charismatic version, to advocate evangelisation of the community, empowerment of individuals to “change” the community and the country “for Jesus Christ”, to “pray against” the demons of secularism, homosexuality, sexual decadence, alcohol, gambling, bad habits, etc etc, and an overall desire to make everyone a christian.

 

Yes, such annoying silliness is prevalent in Singapore too.

 

*******

 

 

not the first time…

 

The case regarding Michael Licona and his views on Matthew 27 was not the first time in which the loony evangelical Norman Geisler had a hand in modern-day witchhunting.

 

In 1984, Geisler was responsible for mobilising an effort to exterminate a fellow evangelical, Dr Robert Gundry, from the Evangelical Theological Society for his commentary on the gospel of Matthew entitled Matthew: A Commentary on His Literary and Theological Art, published by Eerdmans in 1982.

 

Dr Gundry apparently mentioned in the book that the writers of the gospels, especially that of Matthew and Luke, have edited and adapted their works to fit their reading audiences and as such, subtly hinted to the notion that the gospels might not be reliable historical or biographical accounts, in the modern sense of the word “history”. In the jargon of biblical scholarship, such a concept about authorial editing and adaptation is called redaction criticism, and is a very old concept that has been used in biblical scholarship for more than a century.

 

It is nothing novel or unorthodox in mainline biblical scholarship.

 

Dr Gundry’s contention that the infancy or birth narratives of Jesus might be riddled with nonhistorical embellishments is also not new – in fact, it is almost a no-brainer in modern biblical scholarship that the birth narratives of Jesus are not historical accounts.

 

Evangelical scholars remove Robert Gundry for his views on Matthew

 

But of course, in the world of evangelical “scholarship”, anything that does not sync with the assumptions of biblical inerrancy and infallibility would be labeled as heretical or unorthodox. This is circular reasoning and anti-scholarship gone to seed! Genuine scholarship requires the pursuit of “truth” wherever it may lead, and not the pseudo-scholarly attempts to reinterpret data to fit one’s preconcluded bias.

 

Hence it is my plea that if you really want to study christian theology and christian origins, you should study in reputable and credible institutions like Harvard Divinity School, Union Theological Seminary NY, Claremont School of Theology, Yale Divinity School, the divinity faculties of Cambridge and Oxford, Heythrop College London, and probably any religious or theology department in a liberal arts university.

 

 

For goodness’ and intellectual integrity’s sake, please avoid faith-based seminaries like the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Dallas Theological Seminary, Covenant Theological Seminary, the Master’s Seminary, the Singapore Bible College, Far Eastern Bible College, etc. These are very sectarian institutions that spurn genuine intellectual inquiry and free thought.

 

*******

 

witchhunts in the 21st century

 

Evangelical christian apologist Michael Licona, who was rightfully trounced by New Testament textual scholar Bart Ehrman in a debate about the resurrection of Jesus in 2008, was recently burnt at the proverbial heresy stake for proposing that the texts in Matthew 27 which mentioned about the bodily resurrection of past saints from the grave are figurative and thus not meant to be interpreted literally.

 

He made the following statement in his 2010′s 700-page book entitled The Resurrection of Jesus:

 

“Based on my reading of the Greco-Roman, Jewish, and biblical literature, I proposed that the raised saints are best interpreted as Matthew’s use of an apocalyptic symbol communicating that the Son of God had just died,”

 

And just for this teeny weeny statement in a 700-page book, Licona was accused by fellow evangelicals Norman Geisler as well as Albert Mohler of denying the full inerrancy of the bible. The former had gone bonkers by even calling Licona to recant his position. Hmm…thoughts of the Inquisition flood my mind when I read that.

 

Interpretation Sparks a Grave Theology Debate

 

Now, evangelical christians love to sit around in their churches and seminaries to argue, fight and debate over trivial non-sense that can never be verified, akin to debating over the emperor’s new but non-existent clothes.

 

So what if that particular passage in Matthew 27 is figurative, metaphorical or even fictional? So what?? Michael Licona is still as evangelical as the next Southern Baptist who affirms myths as scientific fact.

 

It is to evangelicalism’s credit that some in their loony fold stood to support Licona as he voluntarily resigned from his post at Southern Evangelical Seminary in Charlotte, North Carolina. Otherwise, he would have been fired – and American evangelicalism would take another ten steps backward. No wonder – North Carolina is one of the many US states that are riddled with country bumpkins who take the bible literally.

 

Sigh – instead of fighting over this interpretation and that interpretation, this theology and that theology – christians should be concerned about the ecological health of our planet, the would-be extinctions of many of our fellow earthlings, global poverty, the disabled and handicapped in our midst, the discrimination of homosexuals, the rampant child abuse in the Catholic church, human trafficking for sexual slavery, paedophilia, the barbarisms which occur in nations like Saudi Arabia and Uganda, etc. Christians should be the hand of God for social justice, human rights and human liberty. Christians should be at the forefront of compassion, healing and love to a broken world.

 

And instead – it is the free thinkers, atheists and humanists who are leading the way in this regard.

 

What a disgrace.

 

*******

 

i am a christian!

 

“My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Saviour as a fighter. It points me to the man who…recognised these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them….In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage that tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the JEWISH POISON.

Today after 2000 years, with deepest emotion I recognise more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the cross.”

- Adolf Hitler in 1922 

 

*******

 

the religious influence behind nazism

 

Life comes from God and returns to God. All life and all races follow God’s ordinances. No people and no race can ignore them. We want the German youth to again recognize the religious nature of life. They must realize that God wants the individual as well as the whole people, and that they lose contact with life when they lose contact with God!

 

God and nation are the two foundations of the life of the individual and the community. We want no shallow and superficial piety, but rather a deep faith that God guides the world, that he controls it, and a consciousness of the relationship between God and each individual, and between God and the life of the people and the fatherland.

 

The National Socialist state will promote such a deeply religious educational system. We want parents to support and strengthen this by honesty and by good example.

 

Race, military training, leadership, religion! These are the four unshakable foundations of the new German National Socialist education!

 

***

This is an excerpt from an article entitled “Educational Principles of the New Germany” from a Nazi magazine for women, Frauen Warte, in Nazi Germany.

 

*******

 

terry eagleton on fundamentalism

 

There are two things desirable for fighting fundamentalists. The first is not to be one yourself. The US government’s war on the movement is somewhat compromised by the fact that it is run by scripture-spouting fanatics for whom the sanctity of human life ends at the moment of birth. This is rather like using the British National party to run ex-Nazis to earth, or hiring Henry Kissinger to investigate mass murder, as George Bush recently did by nominating him to inquire into the background to September 11. Fundamentalists of the Texan stripe are not best placed to hunt down the Taliban variety.

 

The second desirable thing is to know what fundamentalism is. The answer to this is less obvious than it might seem. Fundamentalism doesn’t just mean people with fundamental beliefs, since that covers everyone. Being a person means being constituted by certain basic convictions, even if they are largely unconscious. What you are, in the end, is what you cannot walk away from. These convictions do not need to be burning or eye-catching or even true; they just have to go all the way down, like believing that Caracas is in Venezuela or that torturing babies is wrong. They are the kind of beliefs that choose us more than we choose them. Sceptics who doubt you can know anything for sure have at least one fundamental conviction. “Fundamental” doesn’t necessarily mean “worth dying for”. You may be passionately convinced that the quality of life in San Francisco is superior to that in Strabane, but reluctant to go to the gallows for it.

 

Fundamentalists are not always the type who seize you by the throat with one fist while thumping the table with the other. There are plenty of soft-spoken, self-effacing examples of the species. It isn’t a question of style. Nor is the opposite of fundamentalism lukewarmness, or the tiresome liberal prejudice that the truth always lies somewhere in the middle. Tolerance and partisanship are not incompatible. Anti-fundamentalists are not people without passionate beliefs; they are people who number among their passionate beliefs the conviction that you have as much right to your opinion as they have. And for this, some of them are certainly prepared to die. The historian AJP Taylor was once asked at an interview for an Oxford fellowship whether it was true that he held extreme political beliefs, to which he replied that it was, but that he held them moderately. He may have been hinting that he was a secret sceptic, but he probably just meant that he did not agree with forcing his beliefs on others.

 

The word “fundamentalism” was first used in the early years of the last century by anti-liberal US Christians, who singled out seven supposed fundamentals of their faith. The word, then, is not one of those derogatory terms that only other people use about you, like “fatso”. It began life as a proud self-description. The first of the seven fundamentals was a belief in the literal truth of the Bible; and this is probably the best definition of fundamentalism there is. It is basically a textual affair. Fundamentalists are those who believe that our linguistic currency is trustworthy only if it is backed by the gold standard of the Word of Words. They see God as copperfastening human meaning. Fundamentalism means sticking strictly to the script, which in turn means being deeply fearful of the improvised, ambiguous or indeterminate.

 

Fundamentalists, however, fail to realise that the phrase “sacred text” is self-contradictory. Since writing is meaning that can be handled by anybody, any time, it is always profane and promiscuous. Meaning that has been written down is bound to be unhygienic. Words that could only ever mean one thing would not be words. Fundamentalism is the paranoid condition of those who do not see that roughness is not a defect of human existence, but what makes it work. For them, it is as though we have to measure Everest down to the last millimetre if we are not to be completely stumped about how high it is. It is not surprising that fundamentalism abhors sexuality and the body, since in one sense all flesh is rough, and all sex is rough trade.

 

The New Testament author known as Luke is presumably aware that Jesus was actually born in Galilee. But he needs to have him born in Judea, since the Messiah is to spring from the Judea-based house of David. A Messiah born in bumpkinish Galilee would be like one born in Gary, Indiana. So Luke coolly invents a Roman census, for which there is no independent evidence, which requires everyone to return to their place of birth to be registered. Since Jesus’s father Joseph comes from Bethlehem in Judea, he and his wife Mary obediently trudge off to the town, where Jesus is conveniently born.

 

It would be hard to think up a more ludicrous way of registering the population of the entire Roman empire than having them all return to their birthplaces. Why not just register them on the spot? The result of such a madcap scheme would have been total chaos. The traffic jams would have made Ken Livingstone’s job look positively cushy. And we would almost certainly have heard about this international gridlocking from rather more disinterested witnesses than Luke. Yet fundamentalists must take Luke at his word.

 

Fundamentalists are really necrophiliacs, in love with a dead letter. The letter of the sacred text must be rigidly embalmed if it is to imbue life with the certitude and finality of death. Matthew’s gospel, in a moment of carelessness, presents Jesus as riding into Jerusalem on both a colt and an ass – in which case, for the fundamentalist, the Son of God must indeed have had one leg thrown over each.

 

The fundamentalist is a more diseased version of the argument-from-the-floodgates type of conservative. Once you allow one motorist to throw up out of the car window without imposing a lengthy prison sentence, then before you know where you are, every motorist will be throwing up out of the window all the time, and the roads will become impassable. It is this kind of pathological anxiety, pressed to an extreme, which drove the religious police in Mecca early last year to send fleeing schoolgirls back into their burning school because they were not wearing their robes and head dresses, and which inspires family-loving US pro-lifers eager to incinerate Iraq to gun down doctors who terminate pregnancies. To read the world literally is a kind of insanity.

 

*******

 

This article was originally published in The Guardian under the title Pedants and Partisans, on 22 February 2003.

 

 

deaths caused by misinformation

 

If the reports by BBC News and The Independent are anything to go by, certain evangelical churches located in London, Manchester and Glasgow should be prosecuted by the law by causing the deaths of at least three HIV sufferers. These women were actually persuaded by their pastors to stop taking their life-saving medication as an act of faith in the healing powers of God.

 

Prayer can cure, Churches tell those with HIV

 

According to the same report, a mentally-ill man chose not to seek psychiatric help after being convinced by his pastors that he was not mentally ill. He eventually committed suicide, last year, after his condition worsened.

 

This is a grave problem in the UK that has to be tackled head-on before more innocent lives are lost. Although people should be allowed freedom of worship in a modern civilised society, it becomes a crime against humanity when lives are lost due to false cures offered by religious authorities. Such practices should be prohibited.

 

But at least these churches are intellectually honest with themselves by going all the way in their beliefs about the efficacy of prayer, unlike the majority of semi-enlightened evangelicals who pay lip service to the power of prayer but in all practical terms, have more trust in medical science than their god.

 

In my opinion, such evangelicals do more harm to society than the loony ones by claiming falsehoods about prayer when in fact, as their loonier counterparts have proven, prayer does NOT work. If you take medicine and pray, and you get well – you cannot claim that it was God who healed you – unless you simply pray without taking medication or any other medical treatment.

 

But of course, the average evangelical christian would not avoid taking medication in which case he/she is placing their real trust and faith in medical science.

 

*******

 

if you’re struggling financially…

 

all you’ve got to do is pay your tithes to God (through your local church, that is)!

 

This was what evangelical Pat Robertson said in response to a question posed to him by a Christian viewer of his programme.

 

Robertson: Those Struggling Financially must keep Tithing

 

First of all, the concept of tithing (the mandatory giving of 10 per cent of one’s income to the church every month) is not unanimous even in evangelical christendom, mainline Protestantism notwithstanding. The majority of churches which insist that tithing is mandatory for christians are typically pentecostal, charismatic and independent congregations which often interpret the alleged hebrew texts which claim that non-tithers are robbing God, literally and non-contextually. And it is also very revealing that most megachurches insist on tithing – it is where their wealth comes from.

 

Secondly, it is inhumane and cruel to use religion to “force” someone to let go a portion of his/her income when that person is already struggling to keep ends meet. A rational person knows that the tithed portion could be put to better use.

 

Thirdly, it is utter RUBBISH to propose giving one’s hard-earned money to the church as a solution to become more financially stable or sound. This has often been the contorted logic of evangelical christianity that somehow the more one gives (and it is always in monetary terms), the more one will receive in return (and erroneously it has been preached that the returns would also be monetary). The existential “blessings” that one attains by giving to others cannot be quantified and made tangible by the use of monies. In fact, the recurring theme throughout the bible is of sacrifice and acceptance of one’s lot in life, more than the preoccupation with money. Why not the giving of one’s time and effort? Or one’s skills?

 

Fourthly, anecdotes of financial blessings do not and should not count. Such anecdotes and “testimonies” are always subjective, and the human psyche is prone to exaggeration, redaction, extrapolation and misinterpretation. Most of the time, experiences of increased financial help or blessings are usually due to other factors like the harness of one’s own increased professional competence, coincidence and genuine human compassion.

 

Personally, tithing is but religious abuse.

 

*******

 

no lack of biblical literalists in singapore

 

This morning I was rather distracted during the church service, having to force myself to keep awake on a few occasions. As usual, the “praise and worship” portion was beyond me as I prefer stillness and solitude to raucous clapping and concert-style singing.

 

The preacher was a regular visitor, an amiable and jovial bespectacled middle-aged bloke with a full head of straight and shaggy black hair, conspicuously coloured with a sliver of distinguished white, somewhat exactly in the middle. He pastors a small congregation that shares the campus grounds with a local halfway house for former convicts in the Singapore prison system.

 

Although his speech was fluent, his pronunciation left much to be desired for, mispronouncing numerous English words by putting the stress on the wrong syllable. Although no decent parishioner would fault a preacher on his/her speech, which is but only a peripheral issue compared to the content of the homily; I couldn’t help myself being the snobbish pedant. I wouldn’t blame such an individual for such an “error” if we were in conversation over a cup of coffee, but over the lectern or the pulpit, it is another matter all together.

 

Anyhow, throughout the entire length of his homily, I was skipping in and out of my own thoughts – thinking to myself how difficult it is to find a pastor in Singapore who is a non-literalist and whose theology is mainstream liberal, probably in the tradition of Paul Tillich and the benign Church of England. I could catch myself wince and grimace at the several times in which the preacher this morning mentioned about not diluting the “gospel” of Christ and not “changing” the message to suit the secular world.

 

Isn’t this the problem with religious fundamentalism in general? A mindset that is preoccupied with premodernity, always looking back instead of looking forward and the propensity to view change and innovation as a moral evil?

 

It is not an issue about compromise, about being palatable to the current zeitgeist. It is about in constant dialogue and engagement with current knowledge and research. In order for the church to be thoroughly relevant and empowered to “minister” to the current culture, it has to do theology in a way that correlates the different strands of knowledge – christian theology, modern philosophy, evolutionary biology, quantum physics, neuroscience, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, archaeology, etc.

 

I don’t know if this pastor views the bible as inerrant and infallible, but if he is properly educated during his days as a seminarian, he should know that the bible is written by men, in the language of myth and fable, and not supposed to be interpreted literally. And as such, christian doctrines have to be modified, changed and reformulated, tampered by the findings of other fields of knowledge, so as to be relevant for the 21st century.

 

I don’t expect the average pastor to be a polymath of course, but as learning is a lifelong experience, a preacher should embody the noble ideals of a keen mind that is willing to learn and engage with the sciences, the liberal arts and the humanities. As all truth is God’s truth, so to speak, there is the sense of the sacred in any field of human inquiry, and as such as Christians we can learn even from literature, poetry and biology.

 

For example, the fall of Adam and Eve cannot be understood as an original sin suffered by our literal ancestors (we do not have a specific ancestor but a continuum of ancestors, from other species all the way to being primates and then the great apes and then to the hominids) – but perhaps a metaphor that represents an estrangement from complete human fulfillment.

 

Modern historical research has also provided us with a rather skimpy image of the real Jesus, who according to some scholars might be nothing more than a fictional mythological character like Zeus, or if he indeed existed, is simply a human being like any other. So in all likelihood, our understanding of Jesus have to change and our christology has to be reformulated so as to be intellectually honest with ourselves.

 

And so on and so forth.

 

And thus the concept of “heresy” or “false doctrine” will have no place in the modern church. There is no such thing as false doctrine, but only archaic doctrines that are no longer intellectually plausible in this day and age. Biblical literalists love to speak of the “old old gospel”, as though to go back to premodernity is something honorable and good.

 

The preacher this morning ended his almost an hour-long homily with a comment regarding the state of his church. Somehow the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) would not be allowing the halfway house and the church to be using the premises any longer due to some dispute regarding the mission statement of the halfway house in its constitution. The authorities claim that there were some sentences in the statement that were too Christian-centric and thus exclusive only towards Christianity. They demanded a change so as to allow people of other faiths and traditions to be welcomed. Singapore is a religiously pluralistic society, anyway.

 

But apparently the board of directors of this Christian organisation refused to accept SLA’s proposal due to reasons which in my opinion are silly and irrational. It is very common for evangelical and fundamentalist christians to behave “holier-than-thou”, unwilling to compromise and adapt so as to make peace with the larger society. Isn’t this fundamentally similar to the muslim extremists who do not wish to compromise?

 

Sigh. I don’t blame the preacher this morning. He, like any other preacher in churches all over Singapore today, is just doing his job, out of his own beliefs, blinded by religious prejudice and an innate antagonism towards secularism, real education and real knowledge.

 

Thank goodness for modern technology and the internet. At least I will have real intellectual and perhaps even spiritual sustenance from “proper” liberal preaching.

 

*******

 

having tattoos a crime in saudi arabia

 

The religious police (only in Islam is there such a ridiculous practice) in Saudi Arabia recently detained a Colombian Saudi club footballer while he was shopping with his wife in a shopping centre.

 

For the crime of wearing a sleeveless shirt that revealed two sinewy arms filled with tattoos.

 

Player detained in Saudi over “Sleeveless” shirt

 

And his pregnant wife was apparently so distressed over the incident that she wanted to leave the country. I would to.

 

And following the incident, the religious police laid down a law that prohibits all foreign footballers in the country from revealing their tattoos on the field – making the irrational claim that tattoos have “negative effects on Saudi youth”.

 

Saudi bans Footballers with Tattoos

 

 

There is no empirical evidence to suggest that body art can somehow change an individual’s moral values – only perhaps a primitive society’s self-imposed stigma on such individuals - and thus reveals fundamentalist Islam’s extremely paranoid and depraved nature.

 

*******

 

islam’s war on the cross

 

The story of the Coptic Christian community in Egypt is one depressing case of persecution and oppression all throughout its 2000-year history. And if muslims are to continue to oppress this religious minority in Egypt, they will go down in history as one of the world’s most violent and evil religions of all time, apart from Catholic christianity in the middle ages.

 

Islam’s War on the Cross: Egypt’s move to democracy under threat after latest attack on Coptic community

 

*******

religious discrimination once again

 

Privately owned Wyndgate Country Club, located in Rochester Hills in Michigan, apart from its members, also opens its facilities “to the public” for special occasions and events, like talks, conferences, meetings, etc.

 

And according to the laws of the US state, “open to the public” includes ALL persons of the public, without discrimination or segregation on the grounds of race, colour, religion or national origin.

 

But it seems that religious people in the country have the tendency to be biased against people of no religious affiliation for reasons only their idiotic brains know. The management of the Wyndgate actually agreed to allow the Center for Inquiry, USA to use its facilities for an event that featured keynote speaker, the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins. But after realising that Dawkins is an atheist through an interview on the extremely idiotic Bill O’ Reilly programme on the telly, the owner of the club decided to terminate the agreement.

 

Richard Dawkins Event banned by Michigan country club

 

This is discrimination pure and sweet. Businesses that offer its services to the public should never discriminate potential customers and clients based on religious grounds – and that includes owners of B&Bs in the UK who sometimes refuse gay couples on the grounds that their christian beliefs prohibit gay sex.

 

If you wish to stand by your archaic, primitive and barbaric beliefs, you are entitled to do so – but please, don’t be a General Practitioner, hotel or B&B owner, government-funded social services or any service provider that is open to the public. Otherwise, be prepared to offer services like abortion, accommodation for gay couples, relationship-counseling for gay couples, etc.

 

*******

 

iranian actress gets 90 lashes in prison

 

 

Iranian actress Marzieh Vafamehr, who starred in the politically provocative Australian film My Tehran for Sale, was arrested in July by the Iranian authorities and would be spending one year in prison on top of getting flogged 90 times.

 

Actor in Australian Film sentenced to 90 lashes

 

Although the exact reason for the sentence is yet unknown, it is rather obvious to many as to the reason of her arrest and sentence as the Iranian government has banned her work as an actress and anti-islamic activist.

 

How much more evidence of this sort do we need before we realise that indeed, such religious fundamentalism is dangerous and need to be eliminated before the very foundations of modern civilisation is in tatters?

 

*******

 

thank goodness we’ve separated

 

Thank goodness we had parted ways with our neighbour Malaysia in 1965, to become the sovereign Republic of Singapore, who has thus far out-performed and outclassed our bigoted, islamic fascist and racist idiot of a neighbour.

 

In order to attract tourists to the nation, its spin doctors often attempt to deceive the world into believing Malaysia is a pluralistic and modern city nation like Singapore. But unlike Singapore, which is a genuine secular state that promotes equality for every religion and race, Malaysia is a malay-dominated racist nation that favours the native malays over every other race, even though it is obvious to the world that the chinese and indians there are way above the malays in academic performance and eventual affluence. Where is meritocracy?

 

And what about religious pluralism? Its brand of Islam is ridiculously backward (but thankfully not as idiotic as its Saudi Arabian counterparts) and insecure, having the legal sanction to convert people of other faiths whereas its own are prohibited from conversion.

 

Malaysia muslims gets counseling after church meet

 

The recent paranoia and insecurity expressed by the authorities in Selangor over a charitable dinner event held in a Methodist church just made me sick to the stomach. There were muslims at the dinner, and thus the authorities feared that “there were attempts to subvert the faith and belief of muslims”.

 

And so they decided to “counsel” the muslims at the dinner, to “restore their belief and faith”.

 

Gosh, if the islamic religion is all that great and dandy, how can a single night of dinner in a christian church affect one’s faith? Buddhists are not all that bothered by luncheons and dinners held by organisations affiliated to other religions. Same with Hindus and even Christians.

 

Malaysia is but an islamic theocracy that clearly discriminates against non-muslims and their religious beliefs. A “moderate” muslim country?

 

All the existing islamic theocracies today are paramount examples of what a country will become when religion is in power. Only a truly secular, nonreligious government will ensure real peace and prosperity in a country. Has Islam really made a country more moral than the “decadent” West? I contend that Islam has in fact demonised almost every country in which it has power over – crimes against humanity abound in countries that are supposed to be on a higher moral ground than atheist Europe.

 

It is sad that the muslim world are so blinded by the irrationality that is part and parcel of the religious mindset that they fail to see reality as it really is. Which are the most peaceful and stable countries in the world?

 

Definitely NOT the religious countries.

 

Thank the mighty gods of Zeus and Jupiter, Jesus and Buddha, Vishnu and Shiva that I was not born in Malaysia and that we Singaporeans are FREE from the idiocy and primitive silliness of islamic fundamentalism.

 

*******

 

is this not evidence enough…

 

…that fundamentalist religion can make otherwise good people do evil things?

 

Jerry Pittman Jr and his boyfriend Dustin Lee were trying to attend a church service one Sunday morning at Grace Fellowship Church in Fruitland, Tennessee when they were physically assaulted by homophobic hooligans.

 

Assault Complaints filed after Incident at Church

 

The young men were pushed and punched in the face, chest and back while still in their car. The thugs were also shouting derogatory homosexual slurs at the men, even when the police arrived at the scene.

 

Who in the name of goodness would be evil enough to beat up innocent people just because they happen to have a different sexual orientation than themselves?

 

Definitely not atheists and humanists. We are too rational for that.

 

Yes, you guess it. They were evangelical christians. If the incident was in Malaysia, Indonesia or any of the countries in the Middle East, it would probably be the muslims. In fact, they were CHURCH LEADERS and they did the cruel deed on orders from their big boss, the senior pastor!!

 

Yes, the senior pastor.

 

And this pastor also happened to be the father of one of the victims. So it seems that there is more to it than meets the eye. This is a family squabble, a case of a religious father who cannot accept his homosexual son.

 

This is not only so sad but also damn infuriating. Please OPEN your FUCKING EYES, all of you evangelical christians out there. There is SO MUCH EVIDENCE out on the streets to prove that somehow god-fearing people are more evil and morally corrupt than ordinary non-religious folks like me. And thus it is bullshit to keep claiming that there can be no morality without god or religion.

 

Who are the purveyors of homophobia but the religious? Who are the purveyors of crass racism and slavery in the past but the religious? Who are the cause of so much war and bloodshed in the past and present BUT the religious? Who would shoot abortion doctors BUT the religiously insane? Who believes that non-muslims are damned for hellfire but the islamically deluded? Who would want to eradicate all casinoes, brothels and nightclubs but the crazy christians and muslims in our midst?

 

The world will be a lovelier place without these monsters.

 

*******

 

some thoughts on atheist activism in the US and UK

 

There are times I wonder if all that effort by atheists, free thinkers and humanists, mainly in the US and the UK, to eradicate religious expression in the public space, is all that good and beneficial to the cause.

 

Organisations like Freedom from Religion Foundation in the US and the British Humanist Association in the UK have often been in the political frontlines of trying to get all forms of religious expression out of the public arena like government schools, in parliament, in areas of public service, etc. Although one can indeed make a case in the US by appealing to the secular nature of the constitution, even as a freethinker myself I don’t really see what all the fuss is about when a student attempts to pray in school or when some form of religious expression is attempted.

 

Despite what these atheists and freethinkers say about respecting democratic liberalism and pluralism; they continually give me the impression that they are atheist fascists, attempting to get rid of all forms of religion in society. Is this the kind of impression you want to give to the religious community, that atheists themselves have this “evil” agenda of eliminating religion at all costs?

 

The only form of religious expression that I think should be eradicated is religious fundamentalism, in all of its evangelical, wahabi and hasidic varieties. These are definitely dangerous to humanity and human progress. But what about theraveda buddhism? What about pluralistic hinduism? What about benign attempts by sincere christians to want to pray in school?

 

I contend that such expressions are harmless and REAL humanists should never force their secularist views, however moderate or extreme, on such really innocent folks.

 

The situation in Singapore is somewhat different from the US or the UK. As a secular country, religion is almost nonexistent in any form of civil, government and public discourse, although it is mightily prevalent in our culture and society. It is almost ingrained in every Singaporean that one has no right to force his personal religious beliefs on another and thus proselytisation is almost a taboo and a no-no in Singaporean society.

 

But this does not mean that Singapore is like Sweden or Norway where citizens are mostly non-religious. Singapore is VERY religious, a melting pot of buddhism, taoism, hinduism, jainism, christianity, islam and what-have-you all in one place. But we live and let live – we simply mind our own business and allow others to practise what they want, as long as their beliefs are not dangerous to society, such as scientology or the Jehovah’s Witnesses (their opposition to military conscription and to bear arms goes against our policy of mandatory military service of every male citizen upon reaching the age of 18), which are banned in Singapore.

 

BUT…no decent Singaporean will mind if a teacher attempts to bring up his religious views in a classroom, of course, in a civilised and respectful way. It is often okay to offer exposition on one’s religious views but always in a way that DOES NOT put down another view that is contrary to oneself’s.

 

We also have our fair share of “faith” schools, schools that are affiliated with religious institutions such as the Anglican and Methodist schools as well as the Buddhist schools and the Madrasahs. With the exception of the Madrasahs which I contend could be quite dodgy in terms of their educational curriculum, all of our christian and buddhist schools are absolutely HARMLESS. All of them accept nonreligious students into their cohort and although there are chaplains and chapel services, proselytisation is a no-no without the nonreligious student’s consent.

 

There might be a prayer or two during Monday gatherings, but then again, who cares? Nonreligious students simply ignore them. There is no coercion by anybody to believe or practise the faith of the school.

 

So I suppose this is very unlike the faith schools in the UK, that are somewhat more religiously aggressive.

 

Hmm.

 

But of course, there are also many things about Singapore that is unhealthy and should be changed, like its draconian censorship laws, views on capital punishment, criminalisation of homosexuality, and its unwritten prohibition against any form of derogatory criticism of religion and religious views in public discourse.

 

But what the hell, people still have the right to practise and believe what they want, however ridiculous, erroneous and idiotic (which they are), as long as they do not force others to do the same.

 

This, I think, is what the atheists in the US and UK are doing wrong.

 

*******

 

this is immoral, religious style

 

The following is a link to an account of how a new student organisation in a relatively conservative US university became the butt of discrimination and mockery, just because the organisation is ATHEIST.

 

 

 

The babe in the picture is Kimberly Danner, the cofounder and vice president of that new student society. The article is actually a guest post at the Friendly Atheist blog.

 

Atheists at Oakland University

 

It is ironic how evangelical christians almost NEVER attempt to “love their enemies”, despite how central this ethos was to the teachings of Jesus.

 

In fact, evangelical christians, just like their conservative muslim counterparts, love to exterminate their enemies – heretics, atheists, agnostics, humanists, liberal christians, homosexuals, practising jews, muslims, people of other faiths, etc – by either executing them literally (in the past) or assassinating them figuratively today by discrimination, criminalisation, legal process, verbal diatribe, etc.

 

Shame on them.

 

And if Jesus was alive today, he would definitely cuss them all the way to hell, just like he did with the evangelicals of his time – the pharisees and sadducees.

 

*******